You know what, I 've stayed on the sidelines of this thread, primarily because the questions I've been thinking have already been asked repeatedly by others.
The reason these questions keep coming up online, is because the claims are made online. Saying that we should call for verification when someone makes a statement that doesn't make sense is asinine.
Until Kevin McClung at TacticalForums.com posted information about this issue, no one really knew anything about it. He has, without a doubt, been the point man in trying to determine the facts of these allegations, and until July of 2005, nobody outside TacticalForums.com seemed to be paying any attention to this.
It was also Kevin McClung that first related the information in Chris Osman's suit againt Strider in 2006, where confirmation was posted about Mick Strider's felon background.
It's only been after this that anyone even started questioning the claims Mick Strider has made repeatedly, including the claims made on this site, such as:
Okay now lets just get this over with...Both myself and my partner Duane, are combat vets. REAL combat vets. Whatever that may mean, I guarantee we qualify. Nearly every male I know, is involved in what people like to call Spec-Ops. We have thousands of knives in the hands of operators all over the world. That feedback, along with law enforcement feedback, is what drives our company.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1231694&postcount=27
The magazine articles don't make sense. The claims Mick Strider made don't make sense. The court documents state information that contradict what Mick Strider has claimed repeatedly, since 2000 until present.
I keep hearing comments about "oh, he made a mistake" and he "paid his dues" and "learned his lesson"
I have to wonder, when someone claims that they were to be sentenced to serve in Somalia
5 days ago, claims they were a combat vet in 2000, has multiple magazine articles describing them as Special Operations personnel, and none of this is born out by the facts... what lesson have they learned?
That it's ok to fabricate their history because people will defend them as long as they are charming enough?
That they can get away with it, because as long as they don't answer questions directly they can't be proven wrong? That being able to win in a fistfight negates backing up your argument? That there is no accountability for lying and pretending to be something you aren't?
What are we suppossed to believe here? What would a reasonable man believe?
I'll state this, straight up: I have never heard of a spinal damaged E1, who has been barred from reenlistment, being recruited into any Special Operations role. I have never heard of anyone ever being sentenced to Somalia with their pay kept as forfiet. It is my opinion that these statements are straight out lies, and anyone making these claims is lying throuhg their teeth. This opinion is shared by every other veteran I've asked thus far.
If it was anyone else making these claims, they would be ridiculed and excoriated. If
I made claims like this, my reputation would be destroyed, and I would be rightly branded as a liar.
Anyone who disagrees with what I said can come find me at my shop, or through here. I'm not going to hide.