Nowhere did I insinuate that, and if you interpreted it as such then I'm sorry for you. :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Again, no one criticized the cutting performance of ZTs. If you want to infer criticism from everything others say, that's your choice.
If you say anecdotal evidence doesn't matter, then how can you say the "factual bottom line" is anything?
First notice that I said that comparable Cold Steel knives are better suited for hard use. I never said that ZTs aren't hard use capable.
I say that they're better suited for hard use not just because of the lock, but because of other factors like weight and cost.
If I am buying a folder for the express purpose of using it as hard as I want, then will I want the knife that costs $240, has a bearing pivot susceptible to dust and debris, a slippery polished CF scale and a slippery stonewashed Ti side, and a lock type that is more finicky and more likely to have issues out of the box, some of them shown to close from hand pressure? I'm not talking about ZT in particular, although some ZTs have been shown to fail like this before - I am certainly not talking about the Cold Steel video with the 350s. Framelocks and liner locks, if they come a certain way from the factory, will disengage dangerously easily or have slipping/rock problems - this goes for any manufacturer of liner and framelocks.
Or will I want the $105 knife that weighs an ounce less, has a longer blade, a washer pivot, textured G10, and a lock that's much more difficult to cause to fail?
I am making an example with the 0562CF simply because it's the model you brought up. I know that some ZTs have washer pivots and textured scales/locksides that do give an excellent grip.