Honestly, this is really silly. The only reason Chris Reeve's can sell his knives for the price he does is the perception of them being higher quality, better fit and finish, and his having good customer service. "CR really stands by his knives, etc."
EVEN IF the guy abused the blade, it is cheaper to just fix it and eat the loss rather than have a dissatisifed customer air his dissatisfaction on a public forum. Now a lot of people will think twice about buying a Sebenza. This is just economics.This is a classic example of save $150 to lose $1000. I'm sure Chris Reeves will be fine, etc and produces a wonderful product, etc. but this sort of response makes no sense in the market he is dealing in.
Send it back to Knifecenter if that's who you actually purchased it from and demand a refund for a faulty product. I would never settle for any CRK product that is less than 100% perfect new. You are paying for their standards and it's worth the money. If the truth is missing from this story and someone did abuse the knife beyond CRK's warranty then that someone should have to pay for the repair.
The lock bar should not be past 50% the distance to the other side, according to what I saw on disc 2 of the CRK DVD. If it is, it should be fixed. There should be no blade play whatsoever, the action should be smooth and even, and the blade should be perfectly centered when closed. I wouldn't stand for any Sebenza that doesn't meet those requirements.
I pity you if this thread is your conclusive judgement on CRK. If your $30 Kershaw is good enough for you, you're not ready for a Sebenza, nor do you deserve to own one.
Just guessing here, but I imagine you guys didn't read the whole thread because that knife sure isn't faulty due to anything KnifeCenter did nor is CRK in the wrong in any fashion.
That being said though, at least the dude said he'd call and apologize. Also, perhaps he didn't flick it open, but it's been beat beyond normal expectations. Perhaps he's hung up on the specifics that he didn't flick it open.