CS- love 'em, hate 'em- time to address some issues

I have already stated my relationship with the company- if it does not satisfy you or you do not believe me, I can not change that.

I live in SoCal, near CS. I have known many of the current and former staff and LT for several years, over 15 years in fact. I met them outside of the knife world and became friends with them accordingly. Through them I have met and become friendly with most of the staff there. I am also a knife enthusiast and it was easy to gravitate toward these people, since most of them are uber knife knuts that make most here look like newbies with a cheesy boyscout pocket knife.

So when you haters start calling them names and making innacurate statements or vicious accusations, I feel the need to defend them since they are not here to defend themselves. Should they have their own forum here? Maybe, though I think that it would just erupt into a flame war from the haters and you would decry what the company might officially say as much or more than what you have done to my statements.

I amazes me that some have said that I have turned them off of CS and they now won't buy fro the company. I don't buy for one second that they were on the fence and anything I had to say threw them over. Where have I been rude or nasty in comparrison to the haters? Where have I presented anything that either is not-provable or doesn't have at least as much weight as anything supposition or wild guess that the haters make? Yes, I have made other comments about other makers, but they were in response to accusations made against CS- ie. the whole Strider and ATC issues. What was wrong or innacurate with that? I noticed that no one said I was wrong on those counts- but still LT is the devil and I am a liar, huh?

C'mon guys. Instead of trying to discect me and my motives, how about simply addressing what I have said with a little intellectual honesty?

Why can't I answer ALL of your inquiries? Well, some are information I do not have, and some are information that CS might consider inside info and I wouldn't release it without checking to see if it was OK. And, no, that does not mean that I answer to them or that I am on the payroll- I just want to make sure that everything is above board and ok before I make any statement that might come back to haunt me.

And to you guys that doubt my motives- ask yourself what you would do if your friends were being accused of crimes they were not guilty of, were being trashed with misinformation, or were being called vicious names in a public forum? Would you just sit back and relax, waiting for them to do something, or would you defend them? Just because your friend(s) has chosen not to engage, does that mean that your defense is innappropriate?

Again, you don't like what I say, don't read it. You want to call me a liar, prove it. You want to call me names and take personal shots at me, my life, and my family- grow some manberries and meet me somewhere. I think you might not be so bold in person. Anonymity breeds courage.
 
All I have to add is that it's now two days since I emailed CS about Trailmaster availability. No word yet.
 
DngrRuss1 said:
I feel the need to defend them since they are not here to defend themselves.
That's the whole problem, sir.
Since they choose to not defend themselves, so why should you? Maybe because they know their actions and words are undefendable? Maybe because they are so arrogent they consider themselves above being defended? Maybe they just don't want to listen to us! After all, Let's face it, we aren't CS's customer base. I don't think CS bashing here affects their sales much, anyway. If I had a friend that was bashed on this forum, I would bring it to his attention, which you may or may not have. Then I would back them up, IF they wanted to defend themselves.
 
I just read on another forum that Camillus is going to have its doors closed permanently and that it will sold off piece by piece much the same as Schrade. So, looks like Cold Steel just lost a maker for probably half their knives. Makes one wonder who they will use to sub for them once this takes place if indeed its true.

STR
 
STR said:
So, looks like Cold Steel just lost a maker for probably half their knives. Makes one wonder who they will use to sub for them once this takes place if indeed its true.

What are the options for Cold Steel if they don't want to outsource
the production of their Carbon V knives to China or Taiwan?

Are there any US based knife manufacturers with the necessary carbon blade
production capacity that may produce the Carbon V knives for Cold Steel?

Or do you think Cold Steel wouldn't mind to sell their Carbon V knives with China
or Taiwan on the blades instead of Made in USA?
 
Who knows what steel(s) they will start using as "Carbon V".
I guess that is the advantage of calling it one name no matter what steel they use.
 
I am sure that if they can no longer source 50100-B/0170-6, whatever steel they find to replace it with will be better. Especially once they perform their magic on it. This is Cold Steel after all.
 
About 4 years ago, here on BF, a person at American Tomahawk Co. gave a far different account of the issues between his company and CS.

According to him, ATC had been in business since 1966, long before CS was even formed. They used the ATC name, and their products were associated with that name throughout the industry.

Along comes Cold Steel, and in 1992, they register a trademark in the name "American Tomahawk Company." The suggestion that ATC should have done their homework before using their own name makes no sense, since they'd already been using it for 26 years.

Furthermore, CS does not begin using the name until the 2000s, when they suddenly begin stamping it on a product identical in appearance to one that the real ATC has been manufacturing for decades. ATC's name had been associated with this product throughout the industry, and CS's jumping of their trademark on a clone product could be construed as deceptive, and very deliberately so.

That, as I recall, was ATC's complaint against CS.

If the foregoing facts are true, then I don't care whether or not CS technically acted according to its lawyers' interpretation of the letter of the law. I don't care if they surmised that they had the legal latitude to sleaze business off of a hardworking man and his company and the customers who trusted his name. Because if these really are the facts, then CS is an underhanded, piratical, sleazebag outfit headed by a preening, self-promoting little twat.

If these aren't the facts, then I would like to hear the facts.

I'm not a Cold Steel hater, and I fail to see why anyone would go out of his way to hate some knife salesman for no good reason. I have a bunch of Cold Steel stuff and honestly did not want to give a damn if they were nice guys or not, as long as they shipped me the stuff I ordered. I'm also not an intellectual property Nazi. But trying to legally highjack a respected name in the business-- damn, that's just a ripoff all around. If it's true, that is.
 
DngrRuss1 said:
:yawn:
I'm impatient because after 8 months I see nothing.

BTW I don't have to show you why a loophole patent is immoral, you job is to convince me that CS is cool.

:yawn: :yawn:

Also I don't care if you think I wasn't a "Hater" before your threads. Search my past posts, I'm obviously just a Spyderco Nut.
 
zenheretic said:
:yawn:
I'm impatient because after 8 months I see nothing.

BTW I don't have to show you why a loophole patent is immoral, you job is to convince me that CS is cool.

Also I don't care if you think I wasn't a "Hater" before your threads. Search my past posts, I'm obviously just a Spyderco Nut.

Do the math- if you can.

"Hype vs. Honesty"- ended about 8 months ago

This thread started 3 months ago. And in this thread I did address more issues than I did in "Hype vs. Honesty". More misinformation from the haters.

My "job" is not what you want it to be. I have stated before that I will not ever nor will I try to convert the haters. I am just putting out an alternate position to the haters. Not for the haters- for those who read your bile and think it is all factual because it is the only (or at least the loudest) opinion on BF re. CS. It is not a job- it's an adventure :D

And as for being a Spyderco nut- have at it. Enjoy it. No one is telling you not to. It just seems that when anyone- especially newbs- post a question or a comment about CS, the haters come out fangs bared and venom spewing and tell them what dolts they are for being a CS fan or even thinking about buying a CS product. The fact that that is the loudest opinion with little real information is what I object to. So there.
 
DngrRuss1 said:
Do the math- if you can.

"Hype vs. Honesty"- ended about 8 months ago


No it did not "ended about 8 months ago"!

YOU in that thread said that you had information about other companies and that we should stand by. 8 months later and the only hype is you DngrRuss1.
 
DngrRuss1 said:
Do the math- if you can.

"Hype vs. Honesty"- ended about 8 months ago

This thread started 3 months ago. And in this thread I did address more issues than I did in "Hype vs. Honesty". More misinformation from the haters.

My "job" is not what you want it to be. I have stated before that I will not ever nor will I try to convert the haters. I am just putting out an alternate position to the haters. Not for the haters- for those who read your bile and think it is all factual because it is the only (or at least the loudest) opinion on BF re. CS. It is not a job- it's an adventure :D

And as for being a Spyderco nut- have at it. Enjoy it. No one is telling you not to. It just seems that when anyone- especially newbs- post a question or a comment about CS, the haters come out fangs bared and venom spewing and tell them what dolts they are for being a CS fan or even thinking about buying a CS product. The fact that that is the loudest opinion with little real information is what I object to. So there.
I guess that is another way to say, "Be patient, I have more"?
 
Weren't you the one who demanded "proof" that the allegations people made here against CS were true? Shouldn't you practice what you preach? I have to say, your arguments in defense of CS will look pretty lame if you fail to provide the information you assured people would be forthcoming.

I have never called you a liar, or any names for that matter. I admire you for defending your friends, and think that you are very eloquent and articulate in your postings. However, I am beginning to question your ability to back what you've stated.

Information that is still outstanding:
-The lack of integrity on the part of other knife companies.
-Proof of CS's lack of involvement (financial) in the background investigation on Mick Strider.

The ball is in your court.

Best wishes,
3G
 
WeaselBites said:
About 4 years ago, here on BF, a person at American Tomahawk Co. gave a far different account of the issues between his company and CS.

According to him, ATC had been in business since 1966, long before CS was even formed. They used the ATC name, and their products were associated with that name throughout the industry.

Along comes Cold Steel, and in 1992, they register a trademark in the name "American Tomahawk Company." The suggestion that ATC should have done their homework before using their own name makes no sense, since they'd already been using it for 26 years.

Furthermore, CS does not begin using the name until the 2000s, when they suddenly begin stamping it on a product identical in appearance to one that the real ATC has been manufacturing for decades. ATC's name had been associated with this product throughout the industry, and CS's jumping of their trademark on a clone product could be construed as deceptive, and very deliberately so.

That, as I recall, was ATC's complaint against CS.

If the foregoing facts are true, then I don't care whether or not CS technically acted according to its lawyers' interpretation of the letter of the law. I don't care if they surmised that they had the legal latitude to sleaze business off of a hardworking man and his company and the customers who trusted his name. Because if these really are the facts, then CS is an underhanded, piratical, sleazebag outfit headed by a preening, self-promoting little twat.

If these aren't the facts, then I would like to hear the facts.

I'm not a Cold Steel hater, and I fail to see why anyone would go out of his way to hate some knife salesman for no good reason. I have a bunch of Cold Steel stuff and honestly did not want to give a damn if they were nice guys or not, as long as they shipped me the stuff I ordered. I'm also not an intellectual property Nazi. But trying to legally highjack a respected name in the business-- damn, that's just a ripoff all around. If it's true, that is.


Ok, this is my first post here. I am a knife/tomahawk nut and an intellectual property lawyer. This stuff is really easy to research, so try this.

Sorry for the long quote but

FORTUNE SMALL BUSINESS
Lethal Weapon
A small-town biz finds its tomahawks in demand by soldiers bound for Afghanistan.
FORTUNE SMALL BUSINESS
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
By Louise Witt


Chad Hopkins picks up an unfinished ax as he wanders through Ryan Johnson's cluttered blacksmith shop in Hixson, Tenn. The 24-year-old Marine reservist says he wants to see how it feels to hold Johnson's $350 Eagle Talon tomahawk; he's considering taking one to Afghanistan if called up to fight the Taliban. The slightly built, bespectacled Hopkins, who's on a two-man crew that tows broken-down military vehicles, thinks a tomahawk would be indispensable if his rifle jams.


Made of high-carbon steel, the weapon can pierce bulletproof Kevlar body armor. "If your weapon fails, you need something that's practical and reliable," says Hopkins, running his fingers along the sharpened blade. "Maybe my wife will get me one for a present, an early Christmas present."


A foreman at a local door store, Hopkins isn't daunted by the prospect of hand-to-hand combat with Afghani soldiers known for their bloody and ruthless tactics on the battlefield. "You're trained to kill," he says. "That's my job. I look forward to going into battle and doing what I've been trained to do." After a pause, he adds, "But I don't look forward to killing."


Hopkins is one of dozens of servicemen who have contacted Johnson since Sept. 11 to buy an Eagle Talon ax. So far, the small shop, located a half-hour north of Chattanooga, Tenn., in the Appalachian foothills, has orders for 80 and he's already shipped half of them. In another two weeks, Johnson, 28, and his 63-year-old father, Bob, will finish making the other 40 and send them out. As more soldiers get ready to be sent to Asia, Johnson expects additional orders. "When you look at one of the tomahawks and hold one in your hands that tells you exactly how ugly this war is going to be," he adds.


Tomahawks aren't standard U.S. military equipment. However, soldiers can carry their own personal knives, and tomahawks fall under that category. Some view them as essential. The tools can chop wood, dig holes and pound stakes. A tomahawk can also serve as a deadly device in hand-to-hand combat, though the military doesn't advise using one except as a last resort.


"Wouldn't use it that often as a weapon," says Col. Stephen Bucci, personal assistant to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who was a battalion commander. "Getting that close to an enemy obviates the technological advantages we have over most people in the world. But if you are real close, a tomahawk is a good weapon to have, if you don't have a gun."


Johnson's fascination with tomahawks goes back to childhood. When he was nine, his father gave him a book on swords and blades of the American Revolution. Soon he was collecting crossbows, knives and tomahawks. Johnson eventually realized if he were a blacksmith he could make his own armaments. Three years later, Bob introduced Ryan to Joe Humble, a man in his 70s who ran a local blacksmith club. "When other kids were out playing football, I was hanging out with older blacksmiths," Johnson says. During his senior year of high school, Johnson apprenticed with a renowned blacksmith in Carbondale, Colo. He returned home to attend the University of Tennessee, earning two mechanical engineering degrees: one with a concentration in thermal science and another with a concentration in mechanics. After graduation, he became a full-time blacksmith.


Johnson's workshop is behind his parents' house, 30 miles south of where he and his wife live. His rustic blacksmith equipment is jammed in one corner. A gas furnace that looks like a giant overturned stew pot is attached to a Sears, Roebuck & Co. Shopvac. The vacuum cleaner acts as bellows. A mechanized trip hammer, once used by the Chattanooga Buggy Co. in the early 1900s, pounds the heated metal. And Johnson finishes shaping pieces on an old-fashioned anvil that sits on a tree stump. He tries to be as authentic as possible when making reproductions of early American tomahawks and knives.


Johnson's customers didn't use to be soldiers, but knife and tomahawk connoisseurs willing to pay several hundred dollars for hand-forged pieces. Col. Bucci was so impressed with the workmanship that earlier this year he bought a Spanish Cross tomahawk. The blade is inlaid with silver decorations, the hand-finished handle is made of curly maple, and the blade has a cutout in the shape of a cross. "It's gorgeous," Bucci says, adding that he bought that particular model because he's a "Christian."


Johnson didn't think about designing a modern military implement until he met (Master) Sgt. John Blair, who's with the Security Forces Squadron at Moody Air Force Base in Valdosta, Ga., at a blade and cutlery show last spring in Atlanta. Blair, 37, whose unit secures airfields for the Air Force in hot spots around the world, was searching for an ax that would come in handy if he faced soldiers wearing body armor. "With the proliferation of Kevlar, rest assured our enemies are wearing the same thing," he says. "We've gone full circle; we're back to armor. One of the more primitive weapons a knight had was an ax with a spike on the back. That got me thinking about a tomahawk."


Blair had seen the Mohawk tomahawk, used in the 1750s during the French-Indian War, on Johnson's Website and thought that its sleek design would serve as a good base for a more modern ax. Johnson worked out various configurations on a computer. Finally, at the end of the summer, Johnson had a prototype. The two-pound ax is 18-inches-long with a three-inch blade and a spike on the opposite end. "I wanted it to be light enough so it wasn't a burden," Johnson says. "But heavy enough to do some damage."


Johnson needs to make the Eagle Talon tomahawk in large quantities, so he doesn't have enough time to forge them completely by hand. Instead he e-mails his computer-generated design to a laser company in Chattanooga. Using laser beams the company cuts tomahawks out of a giant steel sheet. It's up to Johnson to sharpen the blades and smooth the edges on a grinding machine. Then he treats the tomahawks in a furnace he built that slowly heats the metal so that it has a higher carbon content around the edges. Once that's done, his father covers the handles--either with tightly wound parachute cord or a stiff plastic-coated canvas cover.


The last time American soldiers carried tomahawks was during the Vietnam War. Four thousand so-called Vietnam Tomahawks were issued to Army Rangers and other special units. They mainly used them to set up camps, dig trenches and cut through the jungle. But soldiers couldn't bring them back when they returned home after the war. "The government thought it would be too barbaric or brutal to show the tomahawks," says Justin Gingrich, a military-to-civilian liaison for the Ranger Training Brigade at Fort Benning, Ga., who retired earlier this month to join the American Tomahawk Co. in Midland, N.J.


Bob Johnson considers American Tomahawk a friendly competitor, but Andy Prisco, president of American Tomahawk, doesn't think the two are rivals. "Ryan is a good young man who makes wonderful period pieces," he says. "But we manufacture everything." The 15-employee company makes most of its axes at an undisclosed location north of Missoula, Mont., and subcontracts with other factories around the country. Since starting production in January 2001, American Tomahawk has sold several thousand axes. The Army bought 60% of the company's axes, which cost $100 to $300. (American Tomahawk's axes were used in a throwing contest in the Best Ranger Competition in April.) "Paramilitary individuals," as Prisco describes survivalists and sportsmen, bought the rest.


A 33-year-old former professional knife and tomahawk thrower, Prisco decided to "resurrect" the American Tomahawk late last year after he had a "vision of how to help a man who was wronged." The wronged man was Peter LaGana, an ex-Marine who designed and manufactured the Vietnam Tomahawk until 1970 when military orders stopped. LaGana gave Prisco permission to make his tomahawk and use his defunct company's name. The 74-year-old, who lives in a mining town in western Pennsylvania, serves as a consultant. To complete the resurrection, Prisco wants the U.S. military to classify the tomahawk as a standard-issue piece of equipment. "He encountered a difficult time marketing the tomahawks after the media portrayed them being used in less than humane ways," he says, "but they're indispensable tools for soldiers."


Back in the rolling hills of Tennessee, Johnson spends 12 to 14 hours a day grinding down blades for his Eagle Talon tomahawks for the country's latest war. "It makes me proud; we're on the vengeance side of the game," he says. "Our generation is ready for it, but we're going to have a rude awakening about what war is about."




From this article, it looks like Lagana only manufactured his original hawk from 1966 until 1970 and then the company went under (which is what I recall from other sources as well). Then the new ATC started up again in 2001.

Ok, so now if you go to the US Patent and Trademark Office and do a search for the mark "American Tomahawk Company" you will find this:

Word Mark AMERICAN TOMAHAWK COMPANY
Goods and Services IC 008. US 023. G & S: tomahawks. FIRST USE: 19920228. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19920228
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 74163567
Filing Date May 6, 1991
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1B
Supplemental Register Date October 19, 1992
Registration Number 1763841
Registration Date April 6, 1993
Owner (REGISTRANT) COLD STEEL, INC. CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 3036-A SEABORG AVENUE Ventura CALIFORNIA 93003
Attorney of Record Marvin E. Jacobs
Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "TOMAHAWK COMPANY" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register SUPPLEMENTAL
Affidavit Text SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20040710.
Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20040710
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

So Cold Steel registered the mark in 1993, 8 years before ATC began business again. Now, I don't have a dog in this hunt and I don't care if everyone argues this for the next 10 years but CS legitimately holds the trademark to ATC and that is that.
 
digitalrebelttu said:
So Cold Steel registered the mark in 1993, 8 years before ATC began business again. Now, I don't have a dog in this hunt and I don't care if everyone argues this for the next 10 years but CS legitimately holds the trademark to ATC and that is that.

Yep. Sounds like the guy posting here on behalf of ATC back in '02-'03 left out the small fact that ATC had been out of business for 30 years, and CS registered the trademark in the meanwhile. Way in the meanwhile. That's very clear cut, and CS's conduct in this matter was above board, and I wonder how it is that ATC's (seemingly deliberate) mischaracterization of the issue flew here with so much sympathy and no rebuttal, at least not in the thread devoted to that topic. Granted, someone somewhere probably mentioned the facts, but how many pages of irrelevant flames would I have to read through? Is this how the forums work-- bury the facts in an avalanche of crap?

'Course, I know how to do research, having worked as a university reference librarian for 12 years... guess I just wanted to hear it straight from someone who says he knows the folks involved. Plus laziness. Never again.

Thanks for the info, and I retract all my unfounded speculations on the conduct of LT and his company.
 
WeaselBites said:
Yep. Sounds like the guy posting here on behalf of ATC back in '02-'03 left out the small fact that ATC had been out of business for 30 years, and CS registered the trademark in the meanwhile. Way in the meanwhile. That's very clear cut, and CS's conduct in this matter was above board, and I wonder how it is that ATC's (seemingly deliberate) mischaracterization of the issue flew here with so much sympathy and no rebuttal, at least not in the thread devoted to that topic. Granted, someone somewhere probably mentioned the facts, but how many pages of irrelevant flames would I have to read through? Is this how the forums work-- bury the facts in an avalanche of crap?

'Course, I know how to do research, having worked as a university reference librarian for 12 years... guess I just wanted to hear it straight from someone who says he knows the folks involved. Plus laziness. Never again.

Thanks for the info, and I retract all my unfounded speculations on the conduct of LT and his company.

Weaselbites, I wasn't trying to attack you or anything, just showing what can be found factually. Of course, PTO files are kinda dry but if someone were to go to http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91153026&pty=OPP&eno=1 and check out the paperwork for the opposition to the trademark "Vietnam Tactical Tomahawk" that was filed by the ATC, LLC, one could read about some interesting things about this forum even. Scroll down to the Montana Federal District Court case.
 
Back
Top