- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 131
No they missed the mark when it comes to the Ultimate pocket knife.
Sure they are some of the most economical and most precise folders on the market with nary a loose, wiggly blade and every single one of them has amazing snap. You can choose an amazing array of tool combinations to go with several sized blades. So they have come real close.
The glaring problem comes when using one for anything but soft foods or cutting threads. My SAK with convexed, polished edges will hold an edge for maybe two swipes through seasoned pine. That is unacceptable for a wilderness knife in my opinion. They have a lousy heat treat or maybe an unacceptable steel for what they advertize at times. But they cut a sandwich in half just fine.
On the other hand you take a very inexpensive peasant knife like an Opinel or a Mora and they hold an edge so much longer it's just no contest.
So for around town I guess the SAK is fine but in a wilderness knife one looks for light weight, all around use that does hold an edge for an acceptable time or it could cost you. A knife is the supreme food processor in the world but that is not the only thing one looks for in wilderness travel. It must be a great wood carver too in case you find yourself needing that and a knife that can't hold an edge in seasoned pine for more than a few seconds is not going to be carried by experienced travelers for very long unless they also carry are more capable knife.
That said, I do carry the SAK Classic every day, good scissors when sharpened properly, excellent little nail file and the older models had a nice nail cleaner instead of the current tiny screwdriver. I like the toothpick too, very handy. But I hardly ever use the blade and I don't consider it my knife in any way. It is just part of a system. To be the Ultimate, every SAK needs a new blade steel or heat treat at the very least. That would make them dependable. Right now they are not dependable except in very mild conditions.
Sure they are some of the most economical and most precise folders on the market with nary a loose, wiggly blade and every single one of them has amazing snap. You can choose an amazing array of tool combinations to go with several sized blades. So they have come real close.
The glaring problem comes when using one for anything but soft foods or cutting threads. My SAK with convexed, polished edges will hold an edge for maybe two swipes through seasoned pine. That is unacceptable for a wilderness knife in my opinion. They have a lousy heat treat or maybe an unacceptable steel for what they advertize at times. But they cut a sandwich in half just fine.
On the other hand you take a very inexpensive peasant knife like an Opinel or a Mora and they hold an edge so much longer it's just no contest.

So for around town I guess the SAK is fine but in a wilderness knife one looks for light weight, all around use that does hold an edge for an acceptable time or it could cost you. A knife is the supreme food processor in the world but that is not the only thing one looks for in wilderness travel. It must be a great wood carver too in case you find yourself needing that and a knife that can't hold an edge in seasoned pine for more than a few seconds is not going to be carried by experienced travelers for very long unless they also carry are more capable knife.
That said, I do carry the SAK Classic every day, good scissors when sharpened properly, excellent little nail file and the older models had a nice nail cleaner instead of the current tiny screwdriver. I like the toothpick too, very handy. But I hardly ever use the blade and I don't consider it my knife in any way. It is just part of a system. To be the Ultimate, every SAK needs a new blade steel or heat treat at the very least. That would make them dependable. Right now they are not dependable except in very mild conditions.