Opinionated experts, though, have become a dime a dozen.
My take on this is that there is an ideal handle standard that Bernie has described, and that most people agree with that standard as being ideal. I certainly do. However, the ideal is not always possible and practical. If no hickory is handy, or your alignment is off so be it. You use what you have unless it is really bad and an obvious danger. Scandivanians and Brazilians both have to hang axes on something, certainly refraining from woodcutting in the absence of perfect handles isn't correct. Use a great handle if you can, if not use the best you have.
The fact that people can't discuss such a thing without getting emotional and irritated with differing opinions seems silly to me. This isnt religion. I for one learn the most from hearing knowledgeable people explain themselves whether I share their view or not. Unless they talk to me like I'm an idiot for being open to other views. Then I stop listening.
.95% WITH BROKEN HANDLES HADE GRAIN PERPENDICULAR TO THE BIT OF THE AXE AND GRAIN RUN OUT.
Of course competition chopping is specialized, but the issue is handles. Tell me how bucking a log and popping the chip with an axe is different as it relates to the handles.
It must be true, there was no real knowledge before the internet. Yes, timber sports have been around since men went into the woods to make a living. Lets see, "An Ax To Grind" was 1999. I traveled and competed in timber sports for money and prizes from 1967 - 1983. quinton, where have you been before you found the internet?
From what I understand, on very thin handles horizontal grain is preferred by some to prevent the axe from having excessive lateral flexibility.
Ah, irony.
Thank you for this. At least you used the words "from what I understand" and 'is preferred by some' instead of waxing eloquent from personal knowledge and prowess. The back end of a bull features prominently in much of the goings on of sage advice around here.
For historical (and cross-cultural) reference, this illustration looks like it could have come out of "An Ax to Grind", but it's from a 1905 publication in Australia:
The author's reasoning for this hard-and-fast rule:
- All wood is harder to break at right angles to the rings (and easier to break when striking parallel to the rings).
- Handles made from sawn lumber with "the wrong grain" are liable to crack when strained (see Fig. 14).
- If the handle is broken at work, then you might have to go ten miles to get a new one.
- A lot of time is lost by taking out the old handle and putting in the new one.
- When chopping a big tree, there could be an unexpected hollow that the axe head penetrates into, causing a weaker handle to break when it hits the trunk (and losing the axe head as it falls down into the hollow).
The author also advises against a handle having both light and dark colored wood, saying that if you're offered such a handle by a storekeeper, "throw it at him, as the colours will separate when worked..." (A later publication by the USFS disagrees with the prejudice against heartwood in handles).
If a new axe has a bad handle, he advises to use it, and if the handle breaks, then replace it with a good one. If you are "extra particular" you can replace the handle right away.
"It is a curious thing that a good axe in the shop nearly always has a bad grained handle in it. The only way to do then is to use the bad handle till it breaks and then put in a good one. You can of course take the handle out and give it away if extra particular."
Also covered is the use of crosscut saws.
from
The Settler's Guide, by Robert Kaleski
Agricultural Gazette of N.S.W.
Jan. 3, 1905
Holy cow! An entirely unwarranted put down.And really, you should stop talking down to people. I'm sure you have made mistakes with axes, we all have.
Why don't you focus more on contributing to the forum rather than berating everyone all the time. Such is your wont, I guess.
I often go months without posting anything, because I don't have anything (constructive) to add. It won't kill you.
Here is less than perfect. Despite the horizontal grain it had less run out than all the others. I will take less run out all ways. It won't last though, they never do, even the ones that look perfect. If that haft was on a finish hammer it would probably never fail me.
[/URL][/IMG]
You are entirely correct sir, and thank you. Advice on the forum from you has rarely been forthcoming, so much so that I don't recall ever having argued with or disputed you, at all. Perhaps this then is a good time for me to take a break from all this foolishness since no one uses axes for a living anymore, anyway.
Competition cutting is not the same as utility cutting. The way the tool is shaped and tuned are all to make it perform the best possible within the specific context of the competition. Competition versions of cutting tools often look drastically different from their standard counterparts and would typically be tiring or uncomfortable to use outside of the realm of competition cutting.
Again, that's not to say that horizontal grain is better than vertical grain or vice versa...rather more specifically that there may be circumstances where one is preferable to the other, and others still where it makes but little difference.
For historical (and cross-cultural) reference, this illustration looks like it could have come out of "An Ax to Grind", but it's from a 1905 publication in Australia:
The author's reasoning for this hard-and-fast rule:
- All wood is harder to break at right angles to the rings (and easier to break when striking parallel to the rings).
- Handles made from sawn lumber with "the wrong grain" are liable to crack when strained (see Fig. 14).
- If the handle is broken at work, then you might have to go ten miles to get a new one.
- A lot of time is lost by taking out the old handle and putting in the new one.
- When chopping a big tree, there could be an unexpected hollow that the axe head penetrates into, causing a weaker handle to break when it hits the trunk (and losing the axe head as it falls down into the hollow).
The author also advises against a handle having both light and dark colored wood, saying that if you're offered such a handle by a storekeeper, "throw it at him, as the colours will separate when worked..." (A later publication by the USFS disagrees with the prejudice against heartwood in handles).
If a new axe has a bad handle, he advises to use it, and if the handle breaks, then replace it with a good one. If you are "extra particular" you can replace the handle right away.
"It is a curious thing that a good axe in the shop nearly always has a bad grained handle in it. The only way to do then is to use the bad handle till it breaks and then put in a good one. You can of course take the handle out and give it away if extra particular."
Also covered is the use of crosscut saws.
from
The Settler's Guide, by Robert Kaleski
Agricultural Gazette of N.S.W.
Jan. 3, 1905