Only if you are considering the cheap, foreign made liner locks that "dominate the market". If you compare similarly priced knives (like the Spyderco Military, ZT 0200, Emerson CQC-7) lock issues are unheard of except for old, abused, and worn out knives while omega springs seem to break randomly, whether the knife is a few weeks or years old.
I'm not at all worried. How is the liner lock on my Spyderco Military, or the compression lock of my Para2, going to fail? It's been my experience that once the lock bar wears in, it stops wearing. I'm pretty sure that most liner/frame/compression locks that fail were abused.
A tiny wire spring is far more likely to break than a heat treated steel or titanium bar.
It's been mentioned, but yes there have been issues with Emerson & ZT folders. It's not that the lock-bar
breaks, but that the lock
slips, and that is an unfortunate part of the design, that lock-engagement/disengagement requires that the bar be moved relatively easily to the side, and any force in the closing-direction puts a certain level of side-ways force on the lock-bar such that it can slip. Also placement of the lock-mechanism generally results in unintended manipulation during use, which can also contribute to lock-slip. Good manufacturing minimizes this and tries to accommodate wear but users still need to be aware of these concerns. Also, that liner/frame is usually deliberately
soft cheap steel (420J2) intended to resist corrosion, not resist deformation. When a liner-lock is abused to the point of destruction, it takes a lot less force to deform/crack it than is required for the axis-bar. The main complaint against liner-locks beyond low-strength and reliability is of course ease of use, which is what most folk laud the axis for.
Again, the omega springs are not the axis lock, the bar is. If one spring breaks, it should be replaced but the lock still functions well. If both springs break, I'd advise shoving a bit of wood or plastic or metal or cord behind the lock-bar (or the safety switch if you have an A/O or auto like the barrage) when engaged whereupon the lock
still functions as a lock, i.e. it prevents the blade from closing accidentally. It is certainly less user-friendly at that point, doesn't work as it should, but it hasn't "failed".
If the liner-lock is prone to slipping or blade-play, you could devise a liner-block (like the roto or LAWKS) but it's otherwise shot. A slipping back-lock might as well be a slip-joint.
The most common complaint about the Para2 lock is unavoidable blade-play - just part of the design. *shrug* I don't see it breaking or slipping ever. But again, what knife designs feature this? You can name them on one hand.
You can abuse most axis-locks to no end and not experience failure (lock-slip), although i have certainly seen it, where the axis-bar doesn't fully engage the tang, has nothing to do with the springs - VERY bad since benchmades tend to pivot so easily. Hopefully those are rare.
But again, I support calls for Benchmade to make/use more durable spring-wire :thumbup: