I just opened my Inkosi that was delivered a few hours ago. (I'm at work as I type this.) First impression of it was "that's smaller than I thought." I've never been a big fan of finger grooves on a knife, but they definitely serve their purpose of improving grip with a handle this thin in profile. I think THAT aspect of it more than anything else is what makes the handle seem so small. It's the same width as far as the scales go, but from the spine to the blade it's much thinner. BTW I don't have large hands at all. This would disappear in many of my friends hands. However, it's so stout and like a miniature tank in it's build. The blade to handle ratio I absolutely love (I just like blades that look a bit large for the handle, like they squeezed in as much metal as they could) For all its quirks and things I would've done differently, I'm not even thinking about returning or getting rid of this one. My small 21 is still the best pocket folder ever made in my book, but the little chief has a place in this world. I'll post more later when I'm out of the office. The one part I don't get at all is this little notch carved into the spine of the blade just past the jimping. I have 2 pics of it next to my small 21 insingo micarta, but this site is making it impossible for me to load them right now. For anyone who was worried about the demise of the small sebenza; get those silly thoughts out of your head. Even Chris Reeve can't make a sebenza killer.