Is it possible that benchmade secretly owns ganzo through some holding group because no one has pointed out benchmades official response to this.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I think the reason we don't hear a clear statement from Benchmade is because it's a very complicated issue for a number of reasons.
1. Benchmade doesn't
own the Axis Lock patent. They are merely licensed to use it exclusively (maybe). The owners are McHenry/Williams and some other poor dude whose name I always forget. This probably limits the latitude that Benchmade has to protect, or not protect, the patent. I think any formal infringement action would have to be a joint effort between the licensee and the patent holders.
2. I say (maybe) exclusively because the Axis Lock has shown up on some other "legit" brands over the years. Shirogorov used an axis lock on early Tabargans and LionSteel (Daghetta?) has an axis model also. I don't know if these models are legit and produced under specific licensing. We don't even know what the terms of the licensing are between McHenry/Williams and Benchmade. Is LionSteel licensed to manufacture with Axis in Italy? They call it something different, I think with a patent pending, but it sure looks like an axis lock. Shiro in Russia? Probably not on the Shiro, but who knows?
3. Benchmade has never really had a spokesperson. We've all been spoiled by having a guy like Sal Glesser share the "inner workings" of Spyderco with us over various media. Benchmade is, and always has been, very quiet. This makes it tough to get clear and authoritative statements. We're left with idiots, like me, trying to infer and interpolate what another entity's stance is. The best we can do is gather small bits of data and assemble as clear a picture as possible.
4. If you scour the official Benchmade forums you can glean a little, widespread info there. There are many threads asking about the Axis License or "copy knives" and sometimes a Moderator will shed a little light while trying to give and answer that says nothing. Little by little you can put together what I think is Benchmade's position. A hundred little bits of data build the general picture that Benchmade is very unhappy with Axis Lock copying and feel that it has hurt their business. You get the sense that there has been some action behind the scenes, but there's never been a formal statement.
5. Assume for the moment that the Benchmade license is limited to manufacturing the Axis Lock within the United States. This would seem to make sense because even the H&K knives that use the Axis Lock have been manufactured in the USA. Without knowing the terms of the license, all we can do is speculate.
6. It was long rumored that Benchmade had contracted with SanRenMu long ago to manufacture knives, in particular the cheaper H&K knives in China. Somewhere on the Benchmade forums is a thread (now a few years old) with a Benchmade moderator clearly denying that SRM was
currently making knives for Benchmade and that Benchmade was very disappointed with SRM over a soured deal. The earliest Chinese Axis Lock was on an SRM knife so it would stand to reason that they "learned" to make it while producing for Benchmade.
7. The idea of Benchmade pursuing deals behind the scenes, rather than by public litigation, is actually verified by Mr. Glesser to a degree. I'm not sure where it is, I think somewhere on the these forums, but Sal once sounded off about Benchmade using a Spyderhole. I'm only paraphrasing from memory but Spyderco was prepared to take action over Benchmade using the Spyderhole...on the old AFCK I think, but it was inferred that some agreement was made to allow the hole to exist on Benchmade knives. Curiously, the hole now only persists on the Griptilian, not on any new models. It's a shame too, opening with a hole and closing with an Axis is sweet!
So, in summary, we can glean that Benchmade doesn't like unlicensed use of the lock, but don't own the patent. They consider that unlicensed Axis Locks have hurt their business. They have a history of reaching "deals" under that table, rather than public litigation like Kershaw or Cold Steel.
That's really the best I can offer. I hope it helps.
Copies, counterfeits, clones and license infringement suck. All we can do, as enthusiasts, is to share the word and provide legit, competitive options for those lured by the "value" of a Ganzo et al.