Seriously, all involved....read what Ken said...he isn't locked down to a single source. QUIT MAKING BLIND ASSUMPTIONS.
If I was Ken's caliber I wouldn't allow myself to me monopolized either. He is an engineer AND an artist, with amazing talent. He can sell his talent to the appropriate bidder. I am positive that Kershaw won't pass up the option to do business with him again.
In the end, we all win. Smart captains at both helms.
Thank you Ken for making some of my all time favorite knives affordable for me.
Thank you Kershaw for making some of my all time favorite knives affordable for me.
I had to change FIVE letters in the last two sentences.
Nicely said, Joe. After both Ken and Thomas take the time to reply, the smut/rumor/heresay machine only quiets a little bit. Makes you want to take a rusty chisel and carve in the foreheads of some "I can't keep my mouth shut".
Jeez, guys. You heard the story from the principals involved, what more do you want? Reading lessons?
I was a Kershaw fan long before K.O. Long before. They have always put out a quality product at a reasonable price. Some have been outright bargains. Ken brought a lot to the table, and with their association, both continued to flourish.
Why do some people always think that when two different camps go in another direction (for any reason) that they have the inside dirt on what nasty things were behind it?
Kershaw/Kai is fine. Obviously, Ken Onion is fine. It seems to me the little gossip girl rumor mongers here are the real problem.
I don't see how ALL of us won't win here. Ken can find new inspiration with a new manufacturer (also friends of his), Kershaw can move in a direction to encourage other designers (they have found some great designers along the way these last 25 years, no? INCLUDING K.O!) and best of all Ken has said the door is open as he is under no exclusive commitments. Ken has been great
at and
for Kershaw/Kai, but he is just one part of the big puzzle.
If Kershaw had supplied an Onion product that was poorly executed, poorly marketed, and didn't back them with an iron clad warranty, how much conversation would be be having about Ken and his product? (Here's a hint: think 25 - 30 years ago and Gerber...)
We will win because CKRT can improve/change/add to their product line with great designs. I have no doubt that as I have seen over the last 10 years the quality of knives will continue to go up with some of the current companies as the competition increases. We will all win on that! We will have innovative designs at affordable costs with different makers. What's not to like?
I certainly expect Kershaw to be at the front of it, too. I am a fan of their knives, but wouldn't consider myself a fan boy by any means. But over the years Kershaw has repeatedly been an industry leader by making knives of innovative designs, innovative technologies (think of the comp blades) and backing them with a great warranty.
These are business philosophy decisions made by the Kershaw team to establish the way they run the company, not decisions made by one designer that worked with them.
Why would their basic philosophy change now?
Robert