Mad Dog RC Test Results! PICS.........

As far as the “sources” for the data I posted it DID NOT all come from Crucible.
The O-1 data is from the L.S Starrett Co as their steel is what Mr Dog uses or so he says
and it is not the same as the Crucible O-1 because it has vanadium and the Crucible does
not.
the A-2 data came from the American society for metals and the D-2 and 3V data came
from Crucible.
I used joules because that is how the data from Starrett came and my physics books are to deep in storage to dig out and find the formula to do the conversion.
Mr Welch you will get your knives soon and this will conclude our business.
I'M a year behind as most of my time goes to making my wife as happy as I can as I watch her slowly dye before my eyes.
 
By double clicking on the photograph the dimples made by RC tester can be seen. This is exactly where the hardness measurement is made.

The edge on my ATAK2 has never chipped from chopping spruce or pine 2x4, or deadfull pine or spruce. However, I am not surprised that test knives did chip. The edge did chip when the blade when it was embedded in K2 particle twisted. Other knives I have tried this with (Mission A2, H.I. village khukuri, H.I. Sirupati) did not chip.

The ATAK2 has proved to be a wonderful knife in the kitchen. It can cut up a lot of chicken before it requires maintenance. Also, it is great on fibreglass insulation.

I suspect it would stand up to prying if the spine took most of the force.

Will
 
Spark, you are so critical of explanations, lets hear your explanation. Why do Mad Dog knives in your observation, and in the observation of the half dozen or so others you mentioned, do so poorly while the knives in the hands of hundreds of satisfied customers, many of them military and law enforcement professionals, perform so well?

I am sure all those you mentioned are just as objective as your are. I am sure they all put their personal feelings completely behind them when they think and write about Mad Dog knives just like you do. That just makes it seem all the more odd doesn't it?

How do you explain it Spark? What is your explanation for all the satisfied Mad Dog owners out here? Mad Dog gave us all free knives, and we are all so grateful to have these lousy knives we keep our mouths shut about the edges chipping and the hard chrome blistering? We are all so ashamed of having been so expensively duped that we don't even dare return the knives to the dealers? Oh, I know, we are all so afraid of getting a tongue lashing from Mad Dog, we don't dare say a bad word about his knives, right? Those are brilliant, Spark. Give us some more.

[This message has been edited by Steve Harvey (edited 01-24-2000).]
 
Steve,

I did the tests on this site, so you can adress me.

Spark, you are so critical of explanations, lets hear your explanation. Why do Mad Dog knives in your observation, and in the observation of the half dozen or so others you mentioned, do so poorly while the knives in the hands of hundreds of satisfied customers, many of them military and law enforcement professionals, perform so well?
You are so eloquent at making statements without pointing to evidence it makes your arguments lose complete cohesiveness. I never stated that Mad Dog knives did poorly. I did state that when compared to other brands, Mad Dog does not stack up. How many different people testing Mad Dogs does it take to get through to you? Mad Dog has never won a comparison test by a NON Dealer that I have seen, EVER!

I am sure all those you mentioned are just as objective as your are. I am sure they all put their personal feelings completely behind them when they think and write about Mad Dog knives just like you do. That just makes it seem all the more odd doesn't it?
Yup, Steve we are all liars and I have so much to gain by trashing Mad Dog. Give me a break will ya? Better yet, give yourself a break as your convoluted arguemnts go nowhere.

How do you explain it Spark?
I don't think Spark owes you an explanation. You seem to have figured it all out on your own.

What is your explanation for all the satisfied Mad Dog owners out here?
And what is your explanation for all the ones that are not satisfied? The ones who when they asked about a defective knife on Mad Dog's forum, were ridiculed and worse. Mad Dog makes excellent knives and he has pretty much mastered O-1. Maybe now it is time to master another, possibly better steel? There is a reason why O-1 is the cheapest steel on the market Steve.

Mad Dog gave us all free knives, and we are all so grateful to have these lousy knives we keep our mouths shut about the edges chipping and the hard chrome blistering? We are all so ashamed of having been so expensively duped that we don't even dare return the knives to the dealers? Oh, I know, we are all so afraid of getting a tongue lashing from Mad Dog, we don't dare say a bad word about his knives, right? Those are brilliant, Spark. Give us some more.

And you have a brilliant way of side stepping the all important, real issues.

Steve,

You are a very smart and respected individual. You are welcome to defend Mad Dog all you like. However I find it amusing that you defend someone who is NOT being attacked.

Now here is my opinion on the matter.

  • Mad Dog makes great knives.
  • They are overpriced for what you actually get.
  • Mad Dog uses the "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull ****" marketing scheme. Just look at how he describes the steel and handle materials
    wink.gif
  • The ATAK should cost about $150-$200.

I could make that list a whole lot longer but I will keep my other opinions and knowledge to myself.

Also people are sick of this **** Steve. The knife we tested was real, it chipped and the notch story is complete bull ****.

No everyone can read the results of the last test for FREE!
www.bladeforums.com/magazine/secure/jan/mdvsmission.shtml

I apologize if I came across a bit harsh Steve, it is just I am as sick of this Mad Dog bull **** conspiracy theory as everyone else is. MAD DOG LOST! GET OVER IT!

Have fun!

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html
 
I suggest we have everyone testify under oath, while hooked up to a polygraph machine.
wink.gif


Sorry guys, just wanted to suggest we lighten it up a little. Obviously, there has been enough noise to raise a few doubts. But, if someone wants a Mad Dog then power to them.

We are all entitled to buy whatever knives we want. I have bought plenty of lame knives over the years (some of them intentionally - you know collector interest). Even, if some of the members are correct and there are serious design or quality problems with the Mad Dog product, I sure its not the only overly hyped cutlery product on the market. So let it go.

Test are an observation of fact. The data is never completely conclusive and we are all free to retest, or, draw our own conclusions.
 
Steve,

Most MD customers probably don't stress their blade edges as severely as were applied in the Bladeforums tests or as much as uses by some less satisfied MD customers. The MD heat treatment is optimised for bulk blade strength and edge wear, not a real bad combination for many users. The issue is that MD makes much broader claims and is exceptionally hostile towards any criticism--to the point of absurdity. Absurd accusations can really bring strong reactions from people.

Many people also find great value in buying a "name". There are talented smiths with lesser names who provide better knives, better made, from better materials, for significantly less money. For some people the name and other hype is really more valuable than the most durable edge. I don't think I would ever chip a MD knife, I'm rather careful with expensive blades. On the other hand I would never spend money for a name (well maybe for a Randall--for sentamental reasons, then their was that Ek...). On second thought I would spend money on a name, but not big money, and I'd really need to respect the man behind the name. I wouldn't mind owning a blade with the names Turber or Schlossberg on it.

[This message has been edited by Jeff Clark (edited 01-25-2000).]
 
Just a point of clarification. While I have seen Kevin McClung at work, I have only seen him make sheaths, do some stock removal, and other minor tasks around the shop. Thus, there has never been occasion for me to see him heat treat or test any of his products as I have not spent any considerable amount of time in the shop. The same goes for my partner Bill.

So, while Spark's statement that neither Bill nor I have seen Kevin mark his defective blades by the "notch" method may be technically true, it is misleading. I have also never seen him do 95% of what he might do in the shop.

BTW, my tests of the Busse #7 are complete. The knife should be on its way back to Spark & Mike w/in a couple days. I have pictures and a long report on the Busse, which are a bit different than that of Mr. Turber's. The knife performed very well, with some surprises. Even MD himself said that it was a more than decent knife for the money....

More later,

Tim
 
Since I can't answer any of the other questions going on here, and seem to be the only knife-loving geek with an HP on his desk next to the Spydie walker reject he picked up at a seconds sale last year and hasn't yet bothered to mail off as the Chrsitmas present it was supposed to be, Here is the conversion for joules and ft*lbs.

1J = .7376Ft*Lbs

1Ft*Lb = 1.356J

A standard, calibrated test machine should be accurate to +/- 1/2 of the smallest digit it reports. Thus, a calibrated RC machine delivering RC's of 48 - 62, with a 61.5 stuck in the middle, should be delivering at least +/- .25, though I would guess it was +/- .5, and the tester was reading between the lines. The machine could very well be more accurate, but I doubt it was substantially more, or we would have seen more 1/10ths.


Stryver, noting that all his Spyderco seconds have a notch on the spine of the blade... Nice and visible
 
Thanks Tim for the review on the Busse. You are testing a knife which has already been tested so keep that in mind when you write out the results. I am sure you will be fair.

Folks this whole thing is turning into an X-File. Everytime we are pressed on an issue, we dig for the truth. I sometimes feel that we must resort to Scully's scientific, Ockham's Razor, type aproach to things. There is absolutely no magic or high tech scinece going on out at the, now called, Mad Dog Labs. I am not sure how many times I have to say this but Mad Dog makes good knives. There is no hidden conspiracy here. If there was I would make it much bigger than this, don't ya think?

In fact a few months back, when Mad Dog was giving me a bunch of hell, I actually thought about building an entire web site to expose what I feel is the truth about Mad Dog knives.

Don't believe that either?
Check this out. www.networksolutions.com/cgi-bin/whois/whois?STRING=maddog-knives.com

But I chose not to.

Let's move on...

The Truth Is Out There

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html

[This message has been edited by Mike Turber (edited 01-25-2000).]
 
Ed; I abjectly apologize for offending you. For those of you who do not know Ed, he is a very honest, honorable man, who brings a scientific approach to knifemaking (I have never heard of anyone else who puts their leather sheaths in a vacuum oven to remove all the water before saturating them with an oil which Ed empirically determined to be the best in preventing rust and corrosion). Further, his knowledge of metallurgy is astounding. As I mentioned, he works in a steel mill.

So, I really feel stupid, sorry, and a damn fool.

I really didn't mean to offend Ed. The point about the data was to illustrate that toughness is difficult to quantify, which is what Ed meant when he said that the results may vary a point or two. When I looked up my CPM data, kindly provided by Ed, they were excactly the same as what Ed posted. This was a very minor point, and I said that his data came from CPM, or at least were identical to the data from CPM. As it turns out, it was the latter, but again, this was a very minor point. What I was trying to do was explain how toughness might conceivably be different under laboratory testing conditions versus use in the field, which seems to me to be the case.


As for the knife Ed is creating for me, I must confess I am anxious to see it. I did not mean to harass Ed by mentioning it, however. When Ed e-mailed me on 1-6-00, he said he was about to put handles on it, so I felt that by now, it would be done or nearly so, and Ed could post this on the forum. I am now sorry I brought it up.

I was familiar with the problems of Ed's wife, Linda, and have expressed my sympathy and good wishes to Ed in this matter. I was horrified when he posted it publicly.

I will take the rest of this off the forum and correspond with Ed privately, but wished to make a public apology.

Sorry, Ed, you and Linda have my best wishes, and are in our prayers. Walt
 
OK, now that my wrists have stopped bleeding onto the keyboard, I can get on with the main topic.

I've a question for the knowledgeable posters that said that a line of demarcation between hardnesses down the middle of the blade was a bad thing. It should be a gradual transition instead.

Well, if that is true, and it does sound logical, why do Nihonto have a quench line (hamon) right down the middle of the blade?
I do realize that a quench line is different from a temper line, but it seems to me that any linear area of sharp demarcation between hard steel and soft steel would either be bad all the time, or good all the time.

So, educate me. Why did the Japanese for about a thousand years make swords with a quench line right down the middle, and not have any problems with this, but a temper line down the middle of a Mad Dog blade is a bad thing??

Thanks, Walt
 
Jeff :

Most MD customers probably don't stress their blade edges as severely as were applied in the Bladeforums tests or as much as uses by some less satisfied MD customers.

This is evident by the reaction that the users have to the reviews that contain negative elements. The problem that most people overlook is that there are blades that can easily handle the level of stresses that fracture Mad Dog blades so the relative performance, which is all that is important, is low.

For example, when I broke the second TUSK by stressing the edge directly, a number of people complained stating that it is abusive to do so. Same with digging when I brought that up. Yet there are many knives that this is not even a relative high stress, the Busse Combat line, the TOPS blades, not to mention the HI khukuris. And some of these will out perform MD blades (Busse for example) in regards to soft material edge retention and cutting in general so there is no trade-off being made.


Will, concerning prying with the ATAK with the spine supported, yes I would say that it is fairly strong. When I bent the TUSK that was close to max effort in a side pull, note however that Ontario's simple 1095 blades are stronger. This is probably because the low temper of the spine weakens the blade significantly, the advantage should be that is makes it far tougher. However according to MD this is not the case as any impact on the spine that indents it (which is not much) is an abuse. Again as a relative standard this is very low.

Walt :

The point about the data was to illustrate that toughness is difficult to quantify, which is what Ed meant when he said that the results may vary a point or two.

Even the simplest measurements have an uncertainty associated with them. What you have to look at is the relative size of the uncertainty to the difference you are interested in and thus see if the differences are significant. Specific to the D2 and O1 values Ed quotes, the difference is significant.

Concerning the issue of chipping in general you have to look at the sources of information and make a decision about the value. Steve, since you brought it up, how about addressing this issue, lets assume that MD was telling the truth about the whole fake knife deal, does it seem honourable to you then that MD knew that people were out there with "fake" blades and did not instigate an immediate recall policy? There are people out there that are depending on these blades, some with their lives.

-Cliff
 
Steve, I'll be happy to give you my opinion on any question you want to raise, I've got nothing to hide.

Originally posted by Steve Harvey:
Spark, you are so critical of explanations, lets hear your explanation. Why do Mad Dog knives in your observation, and in the observation of the half dozen or so others you mentioned, do so poorly while the knives in the hands of hundreds of satisfied customers, many of them military and law enforcement professionals, perform so well? ]

Probably because 99% of the people out there who own Mad Dog knives, aren't using them anywhere near their "advertised" limits. The ones who do use them and don't have problems don't need to complain - they got a product that met their expectations (something we all want when we make a purchase). Don't mistake silence for satisfaction.

I'm a big believer in the "10-0-1" law of customer service, here's a short explanation about it - If you get good customer service, you will tell 10 people about it. If you get average service, you'll tell no one. If you get bad service, you'll tell 1 person about it. Notice the disparity in numbers....

Anyhow, back to how well his knives do in the hands of military / law enforcement - how many military and law enforcement people actually use his knives? Mad Dog is on record as saying that the Panther is popular among Apache pilots, wow, I didn't realize how similar a pilot's job was to a infantryman's! How many law enforcement officers use Mad Dog knives? Outside of a SWAT team, I can't remember having heard too many uniformed officers carrying fixed blades...

If all your knife is going to do is sit in a sheath, then it's easy to say it's great. When it doesn't perform when you need it, that's when the real bitching takes place. If the military liked it so much, why isn't it still issued to the SEALs? After all, isn't it a SEAL ATAK? Didn't it do so well in the trials that it blew away the competition? If it was that great, the Navy would still want it, right? Unless they found that it didn't live up to it's claims.... hmmmmm.

I am sure all those you mentioned are just as objective as your are. I am sure they all put their personal feelings completely behind them when they think and write about Mad Dog knives just like you do. That just makes it seem all the more odd doesn't it? ]

Nope, not really. I've noticed an amazing willingness to ignore the obvious and suspend disbelief from some of the Mad Dog customers. Not to mention an amazing ability to fabricate stories to discredit the facts.

I can't claim total objectivity. I never have. However, I am more than willing to argue any points brought up.

I think I'm in a pretty unique position, Steve. After all, I was the only person out there defending Mad Dog for a good 6 months, back when I first got into the online knife scene. I'm the one who was on rec.knives, RecDotKnives.com, and started the CFKAT / Knifeforums after all... I watched what happened, and I've watched the web of lies being spun.

Unlike you, I've seen it for what it is.

How do you explain it Spark? What is your explanation for all the satisfied Mad Dog owners out here? Mad Dog gave us all free knives, and we are all so grateful to have these lousy knives we keep our mouths shut about the edges chipping and the hard chrome blistering? We are all so ashamed of having been so expensively duped that we don't even dare return the knives to the dealers? Oh, I know, we are all so afraid of getting a tongue lashing from Mad Dog, we don't dare say a bad word about his knives, right? Those are brilliant, Spark. Give us some more.

Steve, take a look around you. Count how many people there are, crowding around the Mad Dog banner. Look for who is missing, who used to be so vocal. There are more than a few faces missing these days... and they were "satisfied customers". I see a lot of Mad Dog owners who never use their knives past kitchen work, and a few Mad Dog dealers.

Again, when all your knife does is sit in it's sheath, or cut air, it's easy to say it's the best thing ever. When you actually use it and it doesn't live up to the claims... that's another story.

The ones who did complain sure got great service... I remember exactly how many of them were treated. I mean, when you are called a liar, and are publicly ridiculed by the maker and other customers, hey, that's a great incentive to continue on and get some resolution.

Steve, you need to get this clear - I've never said that Mad Dog Knives are crap. I've always maintained that they are good knives. My stance is that they have very real, well documented, problems. Oh, and that for what they are, they are expensive.

People like yourself refuse to believe that anything at all could be wrong with your $350 "investments". No matter what you are shown, you still believe that you've got the best thing ever, which is your right. But it doesn't change the facts.

Kevin "Mad Dog" McClung can't keep his facts, or his stories straight. If you hold up anything he says to any sort of scrutiny, there are holes big enough to drive trucks through. Don't feel bad, Steve, you've been suckered like more than a few others, and this isn't the first time this has happened.

Rather than disprove any facts, all I've seen is name calling and rhetoric from Mad Dog and his followers. Mike and myself have jumped through every single hoop possible, and yet, somehow, we're still making all of this up. It's too rich. We've done real world tests, and of course, they all have to be faked. Or biased. Or something is wrong with out methods.

Again, Kevin McClung is more than welcome to put his money where is mouth is. Send any current, in stock ATAK from any dealer and we'll test it against a Busse #7 and a Mission MPK, and post the results. Heck, send any Mad Dog SEAL ATAK currently in stock at any Mad Dog dealer, sealed, shrink wrapped, or otherwise tamper-proofed, and we'll do the testing at the BLADE show this year, that should eliminate any bias questions. What's another hoop to jump through, after all.

But I'm sick of all the BS. Please, come up with another outlandish excuse as to how we've missed some esoteric "truth" and are faking this. I mean, now apparently we've raffled off another defective knife from a "former Mad Dog dealer" who was "marketing and selling Mad Dog folders"... [giggle, guffaw]. Sure, and I have an electric rifle to sell you that I built when I was 4.

Mad Dog's ATAK isn't the best knife out there. Get over it.

BTW, just to clear this up - Nam didn't provide the original knife that caused all of this controversy and was RC tested. Nam just was willing to step forward and put his ATAK where Mad Dog's mouth was, when we offered to do a retest. Amazing how now he's suddenly a discredited, unreliable source, instead of before we tested... Oh wait, I forgot, that's SOP....

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here


[This message has been edited by Spark (edited 01-25-2000).]
 
Cliff; while I did not bring this up, please allow me to speculate.

First of all, the notched, presumably bogus, ATAK2 was heat treated, by some accounts, extremely well. Perhaps not up to a perfectionist's standards, but when tested against a genuine Mad Dog, no apprecable difference was discerned.

Recalling all the knives would be horrendously expensive, and difficult, as many purchasers resell them later.

Detecting the bogus knives would be difficult; remember that the x-rays I initially had performed I felt to be adequate, but 'Gonesailing' corrected me, and I sent the knives to him for (free) additional x-rays. For MD to accomplish this would be extremely expensive.

Finally, with only about half a dozen knives having been returned out of a production of 5000 to 6000, it would appear that the MD knives in circulation are performing well. While it is unfortunate that some of these may be bogus knives, it would seem that while these are out of spec, it has not made an apprecable difference in the field.

In conclusion, yes, MD could have instituted a massive, expensive recall, but it doesn't seem warranted to me, on the basis of the minimal, unapprecable gain which would benefit the owners of the bogus knives.

Just my thoughts. Walt
 
Walt, assuming that the blades failed heat treat the performance limits are extremely wide. Witness the very poor ability of one of Ed Schotts 3V blades known to have a failed heat treat described in the review forum. Or to be even more specific, the first TUSK I had which cracked in half under little force was because of a failed heat treat (this was MD explanation). What this means is that all the Navy Seals and other Spec Op people with MD blades have knives that could very well act in a similar way.

Yes doing a massive recall would be very expensive and very difficult. To be very blunt, so is the alternative, for the consumer though. At the very least, all the people who bought the blades should be contacted and offered an immediate test by MD labs to insure that they got what they paid for.

-Cliff
 
Ed,
Your brilliance never ceases to amaze me. I look forward to the knives you are making me. You are like the only person in conversation who I have to tell to slow down on the tech talk because you loose me in conversation. You also get real specific too when you talk about the performance of a knife and how a knife will perform based on its design etc. I really have enjoyed our conversations and I enjoy reading your posts. Concerning your wife, I am really sorry to hear that she is not doing well, it must be a real difficult situation for you.

Walt, Good to see you hangin around these parts.
smile.gif


Steve, I dont see what Mike and Spark say as an attack, I just see them putting to the test various claims and testing the knives with the biggest reps against one another. I feel that Mike is being objective. I found Ed's comments to be real enlightening concerning 01 and hardness numbers. I hear Mike and Spark saying that MD knives are good knives they just dont find them to be superknives based on thier performance in various tests they have run against other tough knives. They are in the running or Mike wouldn't test them but they are not tipping the scales so to speak as some would have thought.

Walt, I have talked to Ed about CPM and from what he tells me the heat treat is very important and if it is heat treated improperly you wont have the proper strength. Ed, You might want to come in here and add a bit about the CPM.
 
Walt,

Nihonto don't have a sharp demarcation of hard and soft area. The temper line, actually hammon has many features in it in order to prevent chipping.

Nihonto is heat-treated with a layer of clay coated on it before heating and quenching. And the thickness and the pattern of the clay can be fine controlled. Actually there are fine stripes of thicker clay coated all the way from the back to the edge and resulted in a line of a bit softer metal inside the the hammon, and that is called Ashi (little legs).

There are numerous kinds of hammons ( suguha, notare, chojii etc.) each is the combination of different techniques in clay coating and different ways of forge folding. Each has its scientific and artistic purposes.

And one thing more, Nihonto smith do temper their blades after quenching.

Joe Leung

<a href=http://homepages.go.com/~jclinic/swordphoto08.gif " target="_blank"> Click here for a picture of various temper lines</a>

We can see the Ashi quite clearly even on the photo of the sword. The line drawing (Oshigata) is very clear.


[This message has been edited by JoeL (edited 01-26-2000).]

[Edited to put link to image, 156K images make this thread long to download - Spark]

[This message has been edited by Spark (edited 01-28-2000).]

[This message has been edited by JoeL (edited 01-28-2000).]
 
Well several issues have been brought up in this thread. Normally I try and quote directly from the person's mouth who made the original argument. However those posts have been deleted from Tactical Forums.

Imagine that

------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html

[This message has been edited by Mike Turber (edited 01-26-2000).]
 
It seems irrelevant that Seals don't use ATAK's these days since they switched to non-magnetic titanium.
 
Back
Top