Mad Dog RC Test Results! PICS.........

Originally posted by Spark:
Please, come up with another outlandish excuse as to how we've missed some esoteric "truth" and are faking this.

The anonymous donor of that knife was actually a secret agent working undercover for Mad Dog Laboratories. Mad Dog's ingenious plan was to fool Mike Turber into testing a ringer that was specially heat-treated to chip on contact with mere wood, and after the test results were posted in their entirety another deep-cover mole would call for a microscopic examination of the tang, which would reveal the tiny engraved inscription:

I am a specially made ringer knife made for the purpose of exposing what a gullible fool Mike T***** is!

The ingenious plan would have made a laughingstock of all knife "testers" and put an end to the whole concept of "testing" knives and ended the whole security breach of Mad Dog flying saucer keys being detected -- if Mike Turber hadn't been even more dishonest than anticipated. He accidentally discovered the microscopic inscription prematurely and he was so unethical he sanded off the inscription and obliterated it! Then he offered the flimsy excuse he was only sanding off the hard chrome to make sure the RC test would be valid. If you believe that story I have some real estate in Florida you might be interested in ... guaranteed to be above the low water mark....

-Cougar Allen :{)
Speaker to the Brethren and Cistern


------------------
-Cougar Allen :{)
--------------------------------------
This post is not merely the author's opinions; it is the trrrrrruth. This post is intended to cause dissension and unrest and upset people, and ultimately drive them mad. Please do not misinterpret my intentions in posting this.
 
Trrrruth! just in: an anonymous Bladeforums source is gathering facts (to be reaveled in a later thread!) proving that Mad Dog and Bill Gates, the two most evil and insidious entreprenuers of the millenium are actually the same person! The evil Mad Dog Gates would probably never have been exposed if parallels between chipping and rusting SEAL knives and the inescapable and constantly crashing Windows '95 operating system hadn't been drawn by Bladeform's shadow slueth. All will be proven when Mad Dog's and Bill Gate's dentalia are X-rayed! and the results posted right here for all to see! Stay tuned for MORE!
wink.gif




[This message has been edited by Steve Harvey (edited 01-26-2000).]
 
Holy smokes Steve has a sense of humor! Yahooooooooo! I love it!

Steve,

Bill Gates was killed in the South Park movie. If you remember the premise of the movie was that the Terrance and Phillip's movie was deteriorating the minds of young people here in the US. Eventually that put the US at war with Canada. The first casualties were the Baldwins (big loss). Bill Gates was killed when Windows '98 crashed and a US General demanded to see him and subsequently shot him
smile.gif


So maybe I would not pick Bill Gates to partner with
smile.gif


------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html
 
Hmm ... Bill Gates doesn't support his products very well, and persistently denies responsibility for failures ... Bill Gates constantly accuses people who test his products of bias ... Bill Gates put secret codes in MS Word, unknown to the users ... Mad Dog uses a Microsoft operating system on his personal computer ... Has anyone ever seen Bill Gates and Mad Dog McClung in the same place at the same time?

-Cougar Allen :{)
Speaker to the Wholly Brethren and Cistern


------------------
-Cougar Allen :{)
--------------------------------------
This post is not merely the author's opinions; it is the trrrrrruth. This post is intended to cause dissension and unrest and upset people, and ultimately drive them mad. Please do not misinterpret my intentions in posting this.

[This message has been edited by Cougar Allen (edited 01-28-2000).]
 
Some questions and educated comments:
First,
Mike why did you use a Four+ year old Mad Dog against new knives?

second,
Kevin McClung did not heat treat, and selectively temper that blade!

Third,
That blade was not hand ground by Kevin mcClung!
The notch on the tang indicates that was a CNC experiment blade that did not pass Mad Dog quality standards.

Fourth,
Why didn't you sand blast the Hardchrome off the blade instead of grinding it off?
That would obviously cause heat that could affect the RC test.

Fifth,
Why is ther always side stepping around the fact that there are thousands of Mad Dog knives that don't chip. There have been fewer than 10 knives returned(that includes the Stampinator
smile.gif
) in almost a decade for any reason. If one of my $300+ knives had the blade chip while I was chopping some wood I think I would send it back for repairs!

Where's the smoke and mirrors in that!?
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Just be carefull not to believe everything you hear, 99% of Mad Dog customers are 100% satisfied! There is an unbiased comparison
wink.gif
.
 
P.S.
Sixth,
All you had to do was prove payment to M.D. to get it replaced even after you chopped it into pieces? There's commitment to quality if there ever was any, anywhere!
 
Isn't it curious that curious gets his mail at tactec.net? Which is www.tactec.com, which is a Mad Dog dealer? And why does this person not use their real name?

Don't get me wrong, I think Mad Dog Knives are probably just fine, but this curious character is hot helping Mad Dog or himself by calling himslef, curious.

And that is the Trrrruuuuuuuuuttttttthhhhhhhh

------------------
Marion David Poff aka Eye mdpoff@hotmail.com
Coeur D'Alene, ID
http://www.geocities.com/mdpoff

"We will either find a way, or make one." Hannibal, 210 B.C.
 
MDP, I was wondering the same thing. Someone with a tactec e-mail addy, with only three posts since November to their credit seems a bit like, well, someone waiting for a Mad Dog issue to come up and jump into the fray. Truly "curious".

Now the blade wasn't ground by Kevin, but CNC'd and rejected. The same blade was never heat treated and tempered by Kevin either. And how would mr. curious know that?

Don't get me wrong, Mad Dog knives are good knives, especially some of his MIRAGE knives, and there does indeed seem to be many happy owners. How many owners, though, really use their knives hard? How many simply sharpen away minor chipping? As good as Mad Dog knives are, test results and other issues have in the past shown that they're not "all that and a bag of chips". They're all that, but no chips. And the propensity for Kevin and fans of Mad Dogs to brand anyone who might have something negative to say about Mad Dogs as heretics really baffles me. Maybe the emporer isn't wearing any clothes.

Not everybody has the same requirements for what constitutes how they use (or "abuse, eh, Cliff?
wink.gif
) a knife. I've always believed "to each, his own", and simply prefer Busse and Chris Reeve knives for my own uses. Owners of Mad Dogs may find them to perform to their own needs, and if so, then fine, but let's also be open minded about this. This issue has been beaten to death, and for those wishing to remain wearing blinders can do so. There are better knives than Mad Dogs for certain people, under certain conditions, and for certain uses. Okay? Let's all just accept this and move on.

------------------
Don LeHue

The pen is mightier than the sword...outside of arm's reach. Modify radius accordingly for rifle.
 
curious,

You're not implying that a 4 year+ MD, albeit used, is no good compared to new knives, are you?
 
I have a technical question.

How do you differentially temper a double edged dagger?

I can see how you could keep a single edge knife blade partially submerged under water, and torch the spine. But double edged I havn't figured out.




[This message has been edited by tallwingedgoat (edited 01-27-2000).]
 
Curious; you said:

Third,
That blade was not hand ground by Kevin mcClung!
The notch on the tang indicates that was a CNC experiment blade that did not pass Mad Dog quality standards.

When I x-rayed the Mad Dog knives originally, one of them had two holes in the tang, about 3/16" dia, about 3" apart (Mike Turber has the x-ray, so I can't measure it). I asked Kevin about these, and he said that this was one of the knives that had been produced by CNC. He discontinued this practice after a short time, as the CNC process could not reliably produce rough grinds to tolerance. Even with the ones that worked, Kevin had to do considerable finish grinding by hand. Kevin remarked that the knife was a rare one, as only about 200 were produced.

I am not an engineer, but it seems to me that two small, shallow notches on the tip of the tang would be impossible to use as indexing marks for grinding the blade; perhaps some of our engineer posters could comment.

Tallwingedgoat; Kevin does not selectively temper double edged knives. The secondary edge is purposely left softer, and, IIRC, the bevel is more obtuse, in keeping with the secondary edge's intended use for prying and cutting things such as pallet straps.

Walt
 
Originally posted by curious:
Some questions and educated comments:
First,
Mike why did you use a Four+ year old Mad Dog against new knives?
We were told that the one that we originally tested was new. It had been purchased 3 or so months before from a Mad Dog dealer, then was sent to us when the owner wanted to see how it would perform.

It was only after it was tested and didn't perform well that we found out the knife could be 3+ years old. At that time, we offered to perform an immediate retest with any current production Mad Dog SEAL ATAK, the honorable thing to do. Guess what? The current production ones still didn't do as well as the others.

You do bring up a good point though, I hadn't realized that Mad Dog knives spoil like milk and have to be replaced when they get older than a year.

second,
Kevin McClung did not heat treat, and selectively temper that blade!
So Kevin doesn't work on all of the knives that he makes? Knives make it out the door that he hasn't touched?

Are you saying that all ATAK's from this time period are flawed, and weren't heat treated or selectively tempered by Kevin McClung? How many potentially defective ATAKs are out there like this? 10? 100? 1000? Uh oh, I see some serious claims in the future....

Third,
That blade was not hand ground by Kevin mcClung!
The notch on the tang indicates that was a CNC experiment blade that did not pass Mad Dog quality standards.
Whoops!!!!!!!! One of us just called Kevin McClung a liar, and it wasn't me.

Kevin McClung stated, and I quote -
How do I know the knife is an illicit Ripoff?
Well, the knife in the cutaway picture has a big notch in the back of the tang on the end. This is something I do to mark a blade that has FAILED the heat treat for some reason or other. This notch mark means that the blade is to be scrapped.

I had suspected that several of these had snuck out the back door finished, as the numbers for chroming and handles done were sometimes wrong compared to how many knives I was actually shipping out. I never had any proof of it until now. Now I know for sure that it happened, but I can not prove exactly who did it.

This is directly at odds with your statement that the notches are there to show that it's a CNC milled blade, something we've been saying since the very beginning....

Jim March also has copies of this email, he will corroborate it's having come straight from the dog's mouth.

Hmmm. Let's think. Kevin McClung says that the notch means that the knife failed heat treat, and is to be scrapped. Then his wife states that the knife was to be a shop knife. Now you say that he says that it means that the knife was CNC milled.

These stories are not the same. Ergo, someone is not telling the truth. Since all these stories are coming from the same person, that narrows down the list of just who is speaking with the forked tongue. Well, that answers more than a few other questions we had....

Fourth,
Why didn't you sand blast the Hardchrome off the blade instead of grinding it off?
That would obviously cause heat that could affect the RC test.

Sandblasting wouldn't have been effective. The surface grinding was done slowly so that the blade didn't heat up. One of you metallurgist guys / Bladesmiths please step in and say just how hot the knife would have to get to change the RC points?

Also, wouldn't the RC be uniform across the face if the heat from the grinding changed it? Just my two cents.

Fifth,
Why is ther always side stepping around the fact that there are thousands of Mad Dog knives that don't chip. There have been fewer than 10 knives returned(that includes the Stampinator
smile.gif
) in almost a decade for any reason. If one of my $300+ knives had the blade chip while I was chopping some wood I think I would send it back for repairs!

No one is arguing that there are 1000's out there that don't chip. The problem is that when ones that do are brought up, Mad Dog seems to turn into Mad Ostrich and deny it ever having happened before, and that the knife must be defective, stolen, [insert excuse here].

The only sidestepping is being done by Kevin McClung. Why won't he tell one story and stick to it? Why can't he honor his claims?

As for the "fewer than 10", let's not kid ourselves with this number. We both know that's not true.

About why aren't more returned, well boy howdy, I'm sure that someone is going to get great service judging from the track record I've seen when someone voices that they have a problem. I mean, first the warranty goes from "No Small Print" to "Sure, if it hasn't been abused* - *<font size=1>abuse means using your knife for anything other than looking pretty in your sock drawer</font>". Oh yeah, if you do have a problem, you are going to have to deal with being called a liar, having all the other users of Mad Dog knives threaten and harass you, and of course, your knife isn't really a Mad Dog knife, it's a fake.

Finally, if there is any truth to the claims that so many in the military use Mad Dog knives, if the knife breaks on them when they need it, they may not COME back. Whoops. The worst time you can have your equipment fail is when you really need it, right?

If something I paid that much for broke on me in the field, I'd probably ditch it. I'm not going to lug around dead weight that's unusable, especially if it can't be repaired. If it failed despite claims that it was a super knife that could be used for pull-ups by Navy SEALs while hacking through cars, I know for a fact that I wouldn't be suckered again by the same maker.

My personal opinion is that most of the knives aren't being used heavily, which is why you aren't hearing more complaints. The ones that are being used heavily either work as advertised, or they don't and the person doesn't come back to get it fixed.

Where's the smoke and mirrors in that!?
I could be wrong, but I'm not.
Just be carefull not to believe everything you hear, 99% of Mad Dog customers are 100% satisfied! There is an unbiased comparison
wink.gif
.

I'm not even going to comment on that laughable statement, except that you should probably follow your own advice. There's more smoke and mirrors coming from a certain doghouse than the combine talents of Siegfriend & Roy, David Copperfield, and Penn & Teller.

P.S.
Sixth,
All you had to do was prove payment to M.D. to get it replaced even after you chopped it into pieces? There's commitment to quality if there ever was any, anywhere!

A wise man once said that it's easy to like a person when things are going well, you only find the true measure of a man when the chips are down. I think we've found the measure of Kevin McClung. It's not great.

The best part is that he's hung himself with his own rope, and has been caught in his own web of deceit.

Proving payment is a joke. Mad Dog Knives are readily recognizable by their construction, the blade stamping / etching, sheath and construction materials. I don't see too many Mad Dog clones out there that look exactly the same as his production knives.

Oh wait, I forgot, I always keep my receipt for knives, just in case that they fail later. Just in case the maker has a breakdown of honor. Not.

TacTec, sorry that you've been suckered so badly. It's happened before, it will happen again.

Spark

------------------
Kevin Jon Schlossberg
SysOp and Administrator for BladeForums.com

Insert witty quip here
 
I like the humor Cougar, Steve and Mike - thanks! I knew some how Bill Gates had to be involved in this ongoing topic
biggrin.gif
 
If I wanted to be anonymous I would have taken a whopping 5 minutes to set up a web based Email and used a proxy to log on! Spark,
This dealer of yours couldn't sell a good, real Mad Dog A.T.A.K. in over three years. That's really strange when people are waiting for over 4 months to get one at any given time. Anybody that believes that story deserves what they get!
You knife experts didn't recognize the A.T.A.K. style knife as being out of production for over three years, OK there's another one to believe!

Mad Dog knives are not the best knives for everyone, but they are great knives. Trying to disprove that is a waste of your time.
The word is out, and everyone that uses their knives knows that your findings aren't factual! (insert Mad Dog flames below)
 
Greetings, friends. I say friends because I emailed Mike Turber about my concerns for posting to this board. He answered with a very gracious invitation.

I am a happy Mad Dog knife owner. Having said that, I am also an Aerospace Engineer and part of my work is reviewing test reports from labs on test articles submitted by contractors. I get to look at reports and sign off on whether they are good to go or maybe a contract-killing REJECTION. Some of my cohorts have gone to court to defend their decisions. In this environment, believe me, I tread carefully.

Before I forget, my post is going to be long and I do NOT have all the answers so if you want to go grab some BBQ corn chips and beverages now's a good time. Again, my conclusion is pretty boring so don't get your heart rates all racing.

OK, observation: Mad Dog knives are advertised as Rc hardness this at the edge and something else at the spine (that is the spine, right?)
observation: Mad Dog knife is claimed to have failed heat treat
observation: ATAK is ground to remove chrome and Rc hardness tested at University. Results shown in initial post picture.
observation: hardness values are within ranges in Mad Dog advertising
conclusion: Mad Dog ATAK sample is acceptably heat treated and is not a reject

I hope I got the above accurately. If I didn't, I am open to comments.

Time for Edmund comments:

I don't know the acceptance standards for Mad Dog knives. IF the hardness values in Mad Dog advertisements are the SOLE indicator of heat treat acceptance/rejection, then this knife appears to be one of the good ones. But wait, there's more. (prepare to be bored by the way)
-Is there an acceptance hardness range for the tang?
-Is there a separate hardness scale used for quality testing in Mad Dog's shop? (there are different hardness tests and results done by different methods. Some are more sensitive than others for wider/smaller ranges of hardness)
-Is there a separate hardness/heat treat test that Mad Dog uses?
-Is there a definite region or measurable point where the hardness transitions from edge hardness to the spine hardness? Here's where it gets quite tricky. For all I know the transition may be abrupt or gradual, covering a "zone" where the hardness values taper off. Perhaps the transition is supposed to start x millimeters from the edge and cover a transition zone y millimeters in width. Also, the transition might need to follow a certain profile or curvature from tip to tang.

In a nutshell, what happens to the hardness between edge and spine MAY mean a lot in acceptance/rejection.

In a further nutshell, I don't have enough info to tell if the knife is a good one or a reject. That's my boring conclusion.

...but while I have you here, a story about Engineering acceptance/rejection: In my previous office this one wing rib on an F-15 was bid on by this contractor. Part of the information supplied to the contractor were contour lines (often called "loft data") given in a table of x, y numbers. One number shows the distance along an axis with "0" being the very tip of the wing leading edge. The other number shows how far above/below this axis a point is on the rib contour.

So we get our first article test rib for our lab to examine. The lab techs called our Engineer over to see what is easier seen than explained. The good news is this rib met all the contour points (key word POINTS) along the curvature.

Bad news: If you looked along the side edge of the rib you could see the problem easily. Instead of a smooth curve including the points, the rib contour went in a straight line from point to point. Obviously this is unacceptable. The rib has a sort of "corner" at each point and puts undo stress at each point instead of distributing it along the entire curvature. We joked for years about the "connect the dots" contractor.

That's an example of something passed the acceptance values at every point in a given list of numbers, but what happened between the points measured was the problem.

Now that I've put everyone to sleep...Everyone have a great weekend!

Edmund, hoping I get tomorrow off from work due to snow
biggrin.gif


PS I am not a knifemaker and I don't work with steel as much as 2000 and 7000 series aluminum alloy, so I freely admit I do NOT have all the answers.
 
If I wanted to be anonymous I would have taken a whopping 5 minutes to set up a web based Email and used a proxy to log on!
So why didn't you use your real name? Just looks fishy if you ask me.

Spark,
This dealer of yours couldn't sell a good, real Mad Dog A.T.A.K. in over three years. That's really strange when people are waiting for over 4 months to get one at any given time. Anybody that believes that story deserves what they get!
This is classic smoke and mirrors. You avoid all the questions posed to you and yet you still attack, evade and drop smoke bombs in your wake. I would suggest you read my tests again adn all the facts we have posted here over the months before you
footinmouth.jpg


That issue was brought up before. So to dispell those thoughts we tested a BRAND NEW ATAK FROM WALT WELCH, HELLO TACTEK ARE YOU GETTING THIS!

You knife experts didn't recognize the A.T.A.K. style knife as being out of production for over three years, OK there's another one to believe!
I never claimed to be a Mad Dog knife expert. I don't sell 'em. Again you side step another question posed to you. Are you saying that a 3 or 4 year old Mad Dog should not be tested? Are they just plain CRAP? Should all Mad Dog owners be suspect of any knife they own which is not current production? If I was Mad Dog I would shut you up, as you obviously have no clue yourself that you are doing more harm than good in your arguments here. Also we tested a current generation ATAK as well. So what do you say about that?

Mad Dog knives are not the best knives for everyone, but they are great knives. Trying to disprove that is a waste of your time.
What in you hell are you talking about? Like Steve Harvey, you are not backing up a word you say and you are making our case for us. Thank you, please continue. Plese point me to where we stated this? I would point you to several statements Mad Dog made, but those are conveniently deleted now
smile.gif


The word is out, and everyone that uses their knives knows that your findings aren't factual! (insert Mad Dog flames below)

You now remind of of Wile E. Coyote falling down a mountain side grasping at tree roots and thin air as your argument is so damn ludicrous. People like you are a complete waste of time to argue with. You offer so much psycho babble in your ramblings that there is no way to argue with you. At least not intelligently.


The only word that is out is that our findings match, very closely, what others have found out before us. Facts are always supported by evidence which we seem to have a lot of.


Here is part of Edmund's post.
-Is there an acceptance hardness range for the tang?
Your asking the wrong people. McCLung would need to answer that but aparently he has a muzzle on.
-Is there a separate hardness scale used for quality testing in Mad Dog's shop? (there are different hardness tests and results done by different methods. Some are more sensitive than others for wider/smaller ranges of hardness)
Show me how he can test the hardness of any of his knives. There where no marks on this knife indicating that it had NEVER been RC tested. Maybe Mad Dog has some really high tech secret testing maching he developed at age 5, right after he was done completing his electronic rifle. (Mike looks a Lori and says were are my rain boots?)


-Is there a separate hardness/heat treat test that Mad Dog uses?
But of course there is. Mad Dog uses his own test that he developed after years of research in his labs. No other knife maker in the world is aware of this super secret testing method that Mad Dog has/uses in his lab.
-Is there a definite region or measurable point where the hardness transitions from edge hardness to the spine hardness?
Looks like it to me. Wouldn't that be ture in all knives though?

Here's where it gets quite tricky. For all I know the transition may be abrupt or gradual, covering a "zone" where the hardness values taper off. Perhaps the transition is supposed to start x millimeters from the edge and cover a transition zone y millimeters in width. Also, the transition might need to follow a certain profile or curvature from tip to tang.
Nothing new here. Of course there would be a "zone" or whatever, and it should follow the profile of the blade. That only makes sense and that is how it is done. No rocket science there either.

In a nutshell, what happens to the hardness between edge and spine MAY mean a lot in acceptance/rejection.
OK So how does he test this? Is this that gut feeling we heard about?

In a further nutshell, I don't have enough info to tell if the knife is a good one or a reject. That's my boring conclusion.

Edmund,

I don't mean to be sarcastic in my reponse to you but that is what most knife makers face all the time. There is no way to tell unless you use or really test the knife before you send it out. That is why most knife makers have a great warranty, which is more than I can say for Mad Dog now.

Why don't you see any of the other manufacturers in here claiming we are bias and/or whatever?

Each time a Mad Dog issue is brought up, a team of Mad Dog supporters come to his aid. That is fine but I, and many others, find it strange and almost cultish.

We did the tests and you guys keep questioning the results which keeps these threads alive. If you want to see these threads go away then simply SHUT UP.

But just like the dogs in my neighborhood, they always need to need to have the last bark. That is fine just keep following the Dog. Just make sure to move when he takes a big dump.
<img SRC="http://www.wolf-creek-kennel.com/abpup.gif" height=54 width=66><img SRC="http://www.wolf-creek-kennel.com/germ-shp.gif" height=94 width=156>

Geez it is nearly 5:30 in the morning! I got to get some sleep
smile.gif


------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html
 
Yes I get silly at this time in the morning so sorry if I came off harsh. Yes I do have a sense of humor. I have to after this much BS on this one issue
smile.gif


------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW RIGHT NOW! YOU WILL BE GLAD YOU DID!
www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum8/HTML/001202.html
 
This is why you guys should buy CR knives. We have a cult like following yet this type of thing never happens.
smile.gif
That Mad Dog is just strange if you ask me.

------------------
Johnny
<FONT COLOR=#ff0000>[</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff8000>]</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ffff00>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ff00>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ffff>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff00ff>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff0000>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff8000>x</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ffff00>[</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ff00>]</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ffff>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff00ff>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff0000>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff8000>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ffff00>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ff00>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ffff>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff00ff>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff0000>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff8000>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ffff00>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ff00>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#00ffff>=</FONT><FONT COLOR=#ff00ff>></FONT>
 
It's all so clear. It's not that MD knives are bad. They've always been decent though not as good as others IMO. It's the deceit and dishonesty that has accompanied that name for years now. It's recorded fact and has been for long before Bladeforums even existed. Even when he caught a break and his knives were chosen and ordered by the SEALs a few years ago, he screwed it up. He kept them waiting telling them he was working on their order but there were plenty on his table for private sale at shows. He doesnt answer simple questions and if you dont agree with him he either attacks you or deletes you. If you beleive only 10 have been returned in 10 years, come see me in NY, I can get you the Brooklyn Bridge very cheap. Everywhere you look there is deception, from the plastic handles(secret formula) to plain O1 steel. And how many actually use their MD's very hard. At those prices, not many I think, regardless of what they claim. And the elusive secret background,oooooh, yeah right, what a crock.
About the only thing going for them is good hype and marketing, much like Hartsfeld and Emerson, only less honest.

PS-Mike, as I stated once on a thread over at his forum-If Kevin ever stops short, they'll need a crowbar to get TacTec loose.

Anyway, my take after years of observing this company. I'm sure we'll be hearing from the followers. Even Al Sharpton has defenders.

------------------
lifter
Phil. 4:13

Dave
Wharton,NJ


 
I want to thank Mike for posting this info, these MD topics tend to turn into some of the most interesting and informative subjects you see.

They also provide some of the most entertaining posts on the site.

Dave aka Lifer:

I remember reading that 'secret background' stuff once (IIRC it was posted on a previous MD thread), I think they left out the bit where he defeated the evil magician and rescued the beautiful princess.
wink.gif

 
Back
Top