Not really. You're confusing ownership in the ethical/moral sense with ownership in the legal sense. Two different things.
Two different things. But utterly irrelevant.
Which is one reason why these threads cause so much grief. Fans like to bring up legal concepts (IP) when their meaning is really in terms of a personal code of honor or ethics, as they see it. This is fundamentally mistaken. And why it's so disingenuous to make charges of theft when there really isn't any at all. It's more like a fan believing he'll be more persuasive if he's just more passionate about vocalizing his opinion by tarting up the charges with exaggerations. And when that doesn't fly, throw in a heaping helping of indignation to really get the ire flowing. Happens pretty predictably in these threads, with hurt feelings as they retreat to the moral high horse, believing themselves to be islands of chivalry in a sea of disrepute. All because of a refusal to accept the reality not only of intellectual property, but the methods by which it's circumvented.