*sigh....I'll try this once more. You can get a very nice Spyderco or benchmade for less then half the price of the sebenzas. These BM and spydercos use virtually the same materials as a sebenza some even use a better steel. They both have very good ff, lockup, tolerances, no blade play, etc. So what makes the Sebenza worth more. It will be a few days before bm responds to the tolerance question. However besides that I think the bm and spydercos are very tight knives and I don't see the .0005 making much a difference seeing as they are already damn near vault like. What is your opinion on this?
I understand what you are saying about the tolerances. I for one, and probably most people unless they are a machinist, could never tell the difference between .0005 and .0007 without the use of precision tools.
Is it critical in a knife? No, I don't think it is. Is it a bad thing ? Absolutely not.
I stated in my earlier post that I have never owned a Sebenza, but had given them a close look see at a local shop to see what they were all about...
I probably spent about 20 minutes fondling a couple of them. I really wanted to get excited about it, after reading all the glowing reviews, but it just didn't get me excited.... Maybe if I went back now and looked again, something would click, maybe not.
I could tell when I opened one up though, and felt and heard the locking, this wasn't your average production knife...
I guess its like watches. I have worn Timex watches for years, and they are very durable. I bought a new Timex diver watch about 2 years ago, and at a quick glance, it looks like a Rolex Sub Mariner.
Is there a need to spend another couple thousand more for a Rolex, than I paid for my Timex ? No.....
There are a lot of people that appreciate the differences between the two though, and for them the extra spent is well worth it.