- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 716
The raw emotion in this thread is palpable!!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
Behold the Tri-Ad's kryptonite:
![]()
Source: http://www.bladehq.com/item--Extrema-Ratio-185-RAO-Tactical--10005
I dont own a Sebbie either but I like both that and the CS.As a guy who never pulled the trigger on a Seb I can't help but think of them differently now. A somewhat fragile eccentric knife.
Tri-Ad lock failure
![]()
![]()
At the end. Find what you like and enjoy people.
Some of my thoughts.
1. The Sebenza has to my knowledge never been marketed as a "hard use" knife. Rather a working knife. As a working knife it has been around for 25 years. If it was all BS the market would have picked up on it.
2. Andrew Demko made framelocks as well before he invented the Tri-Ad lock. Are people going to start asking for him to test his framelock next to a Sebenza next? So that it is apples to apples? Or his framelock against the Tri-Ad (as I am sure he might have already did).
3. Why no comparison between Cold Steels Ti-Lite models (liner lock) and Tri-Ad lock? Or a Cold Steel Liner lock to others for those Apples to Apples comparisons?
4. Backlocks/Tri-Ad locks can fail too. Liner and RIL are made to have a "controlled failure" under load. Anyone that has experienced a backlock failure knows that such a lock will break either at the lever or break in the pocket area and such a break is normally very sudden.
Liner/RIL failure.
![]()
Tri-Ad lock failure
![]()
![]()
At the end. Find what you like and enjoy people.
I think this says a lot of good things about the Tri-Ad lock. You have to actually destroy the knife in order to get the lock to fail, whereas the Sebenza can't handle 30 lbs of weight before the lock not only fails but breaks itself!
I think it's clear where the value is here.
agreed -^
also, that HD-7 fail is painful to see, your knife? if so how'd that happen??
Well, again, you didn't watch the video so why even make these statements. They absolutely are not saying that consumers are idiots for carrying any other knife, Demko repeatedly says that he thinks the Sebenza is a great knife and that Chris Reeve's claims are true. He even says that he didn't prepare the backup Sebenza for testing so that it could be kept.I've read all the posts in this thread. It appears most all the points have been covered. Very interesting read as well as very informational. Not as many troll/idiot responses as in some of the other threads concerning the testing of CS to other brands.
My take on these testing videos are pretty much in line with most responses already stated, "completely useless"
The one thing that pisses me off more than anything else, is the message CS is sending out with these asinine tests. And that is, that myself/you and anyone else that owns a knife is stupid and an idiot.
That the knife in my/your pocket right now is not a good choice.
I feel that my choice in the knives I own, suits my day to day chores and whichever knife I chose to EDC will serve the needs for what I do and will be like a friend and not fail me.
To date, they all have been the best of friends.
I didn't watch the video because how many frame locks do you need to test to prove your lock is superior???? IMO, just one. A frame lock is a frame lock.
I don't think anyone can dispute the strength of CS locks. That's been proven and hooray!!!!! for Cold Steel.
However, don't take the one thing you got going for you and try to shove it down my throat and try to make me believe it's the best thing since sliced bread. Really????
There's just so many things that go into a well balanced knife, ergo's, blade shape, blade steel, material, blade geometry and all the other little things that are discussed here on BFC that makes
sense when someone is wanting a style of knife that will fit they're needs.
I'm just not very supportive of any company that uses deceptive means to push their products.
For real, if you're so fired up about this test happening, are you contacting both companies to request it?They don't just say their lock is stronger. They say they make the strongest folders on the planet. And I say, prove it. Test it against the RAO and then we'll see.
All I'm saying is that people calling Cold Steel Tacticool/Mall-Ninja then touting this company and knife is the height of hypocrisy.Indeed. The literature even claims it can be used as a guillotine. Who wouldn't be terrified of a knife that can actually substitute for a guillotine? I mean, instead of having a heavy, cumbersome 9 foot tall wood and steel and screw contraption that isn't very portable and requires me to make sure the runners are smooth so the blade falls free, I can just buy one of those and apparently it substitutes for an entire guillotine...
Zero
Back to Sebenza. It's more of a jewelry piece than tool. A $400+ tool should do better.
Would you pay that kind of money for a screwdriver which strips heads? Most wouldn't. But hey, it has perfect fit and finish.
For real, if you're so fired up about this test happening, are you contacting both companies to request it?
Funny you should mention that. In a thread which has been lost to the sands of time (and the action of a moderator), Andrew all but admitted he couldn't beat the RAO. That's why I don't think you'll never see him test it. And it's also why I keep bringing it up.
I have no reason to contact Extrema Ratio. They're not the ones that are out there putting everybody else's knife locks down but their own.
I should also mention that Cold Steel recently instigated a lawsuit over the use of the term "virtual fixed-blade" used by one of its competitors to describe the strength of the locking mechanism used on their folders. But to date, I see no evidence that it has taken on Extrema Ratio over the use of the term "real fixed blade" to describe the strength of theirs.
In a test between the RAO and a Tri-Ad folder, the smart money would be on the RAO.
I'm not sure the triad anything can beat a knife that is a "real fixed blade" as is the RAO. That would be a fun test win or loose, it would be interesting. I think it is on the list so time will tell.
Well look at that. Good job, Zero. :thumbup: Here's the post I was referring to:Doesn't look like the claim is that hard to find.
If you want to resurrect this thread, here's the last page, it's open for comments: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...rema-Ratio-RAO-vs-the-Cold-Steel-4-MAX/page15
Zero
I'm not sure the triad anything can beat a knife that is a "real fixed blade" as is the RAO. That would be a fun test win or loose, it would be interesting. I think it is on the list so time will tell.
Well of course you don't care about the RAO. No Cold Steel apologist would. But the fact is, the RAO is out there and if Andrew is right, it's probably stronger than any folder made by Cold Steel. Sometimes the truth hurts.Here's my thoughts on the matter. The Triad block is the strongest production lock on the market currently. I could care less about the RAO.
It's somewhat off topic, but I'd love to see either CS or AD put out a high-end EDC folder that was on par with other top tier production knives. I'm talking something with the same overall dimensions(or close) in titanium with the Triad lock. I'm sure they could do it and sure there's a market for it.