Paracelsus:
recognize the effect that you have on people sometimes and to moderate your own posting style.
Not everyone can't handle negative feedback. I have for example described in the past several times (around 6-12 I would estimate) how the Spyderco Military was not a functional piece for me because the lock would disengage during use.
This is a negative statement which is rather severe in conclusion. Because of it, I recieved more than one email saying that I had a personal grudge against Spyderco, and they usually drew similar conclusions as were made here, wouldn't give me free knives or whatever.
Now based on your viewpoint, this is something that I should not have continued. Yet Sal Glessers reaction, as well as the designer, was positive and my problems with the Military was one of the reasons that I was asked for my opinion on the security of the new compression lock with the direction to specifically try to find a way to disengage it.
When I asked about being public with the results, he had no problems, good or bad, he is far from the only one either.
For example the Busse Combat grip. I have on more occasions that I can count specified that there are more ergonomic grips, McClung for one, as well I described in detail the problems I had in the beginning with the handle on the Battle Mistress. Again, similar to the Spyderco situation, the responce to this by the maker was to ask if I would give my opinion on the new grip.
There are lots of others as well.
Does making multiple posts about your negative impression of a knife
They were not repeated in terms of information. They addressed issues brought up about points I made. And again, this shows a clear bias on your part concerning negative vs positive comments on knives. Where are the restrictions on multiple positive comments, many of which are simple repeats.
Rob :
you mean you have never picked up a fine knife, handgun, rifle or any finely made tool and went WOW, this is NICE!
Tools are valued in my family becuase of their function. Something I have been passed down from craftsmen who simply didn't have the luxury to think otherwise.
The point about not handling one is an obvious point, logically I would know more about the blade if I actually used it. However it is possible to draw conclusions based on experience with other blades, something that people do all the time. For example if someone had asked about skeletonized handles you would get people with positive and negative reactions - just as there was to the recent thread about chisel grinds. Making a performance statement of this nature is far harder than estimating the performance of a specific blade with known specifications.
-Cliff
[This message has been edited by Cliff Stamp (edited 11-17-2000).]