I have some opinions to offer:
I have actually handled a couple of these ArcLite knives, myself in DDR's shop some weeks ago. I found it to be an excellent small knife for small jobs. Naturally, and by design, its form follows its function.
I found the "skeleton" handle to afford a firm grip for me, and my hands are somewhat larger than average. In a way that I can't explain without closer study, the slots in the handle were cut in such a way that they provided more traction for my hand rather than less. This was a pleasant suprise for me, as I, myself, had certain preconceptions about it before I picked it up.
It seems to me that the ArcLite is a better designed and produced knife that its primary competitor. The Arclite has a wider blade(from edge to spine) and handle which may, I think, provide more utility than do thinner competing neck knives. I am also of the opinion that a recurved blade edge is also a significant utility improvement.
The steel chosen for the launch, 420HC, is not as well understood as some of you think. It is my understanding, that DDR and Camillus have been able to heat-treat this steel to readings above 55 HRC. If that is the case, then 420HC presents more value in this application than one might have initially thought.
Considering the above,I have formed the opinion that this knife, as a whole, presents considerable value at its price-point, and represents a significant challenge to its primary competitor.
It is my opinion (only) that this Cliff Stamp is nothing more than a shill, and I take his recommendations with a grain of salt (pun intentional). It is my opinion that someone has an ingenious, if unethical, means of building a knife collection: Receive free knives in exchange for "independent" evaluations!
[This message has been edited by samwereb (edited 11-15-2000).] Edited under coercion:
[This message has been edited by samwereb (edited 11-15-2000).]
[This message has been edited by samwereb (edited 11-15-2000).]