91bravo
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
- Messages
- 28,554
I did! Copper handled PM2 and REX45 blade. This knife was a bargain.
![]()
And it's a dandy!
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I did! Copper handled PM2 and REX45 blade. This knife was a bargain.
![]()
Yeah those 2 in your post look slick.And it's a dandy!
Yes, because you're comparing prices then and now and I'm taking MAP into account. As I've pointed out, the Tenacious was significantly more expensive than the Rat even when it was introduced, which destroys your entire argument that they were priced the same and one increased and one didn't. The very foundation of your argument is fallacious.I added some pics on the OP. Looks like most people people got Tenacious for between $15 and $29.
Rat 1 is actually cheaper today than it was eight years ago.
And when you talk about Spyderco MAPP, that only started a few years ago.
Spyderco makes some great knives and has been driving innovation in the industry for a long time. That's not in question. Commenting just on the Tenacious being overpriced, is that really a question? It's a $50 knife in 8Cr13Mov and it's 2020. The non-steel material differences on the RAT might have mattered once upon a time but these days, features like G10 scales and actions that run on ball bearings can be found on ultra-cheap Chinese knives in junk steels like 3Cr13.
Here are some more clear-cut comparisons:
The Tangram Santa Fe from Kizer costs less than $30. Fit and finish is good. Their Acuto 440 holds a better edge and is more corrosion resistant than 8Cr13Mov without being difficult to sharpen.
The Petrified Fish 818 costs less than $30. It has G10, bearings, and an incredible action. Their Chinese D2 holds a much better edge than 8Cr13Mov. My only complaint with this one is that the inner scale edges (nested liners) benefited from a little filing. Of course, the same can be said about the Byrd Meadowlark, which costs about the same and uses 8Cr13Mov.
CJRB has a lot of knives that cost less than the Tenacious. Some, like the sub-$40 Feldspars, have received widespread acclaim. In my own experience, fit and finish is okay, action is decent, and their Chinese D2 holds a nice edge.
All of the sub-$50 Civivi knives...
I haven't tried any of these but Ruike has a good reputation. Here are all of their knives that cost less than a Tenacious on BladeHQ. They use either 12C27 or 14C28N:
https://www.bladehq.com/cat--RUIKE-Knives--2547#/filter:price:*:49
The point is that in 2020, the Tenacious in 8Cr13Mov is ludicrously overpriced at $50. Heck, the Byrd Meadowlark in 8Cr13Mov is ridiculous at its current price. Competition has really ramped up in the sub-$50 category. Companies like Spyderco, Kershaw, and CRKT have fallen way behind the times with overpriced knives in 8Cr13Mov. I'd love to see that change.
I don't think you have proven your point. Especially with the 12C27 and 14C28. Those alloys can be blank formed, an inexpensive process. They are just stamped. You have to machine 8Cr13MoV. Machining a blade is significantly more expensive.
Price is much more a function of manufacturing process plus fit, finish and design than one of materials used.
Plus Spyderco knives are designed in the US and their marketing department is also in the US. That adds to the costs that Chinese firms do not have.
I can't speak to fit and finish, since I don't have any of the knives you mention. But I do know that Spyderco holds high fit and finish standards and they ensure that the blades receive an optimal heat treat.
The original argument presented was ridiculously flawed. Yours is not much better.
Because it isn't.If 14C28N is easier or less expensive to use than 8Cr13Mov, and is a better performer than 8Cr13Mov, then why not use 14C28N instead of 8Cr13Mov?
...
AsEli Chaps pointed out with unnecessary rudeness, I'm no expert on manufacturing but I think you raise an important question. If 14C28N is easier or less expensive to use than 8Cr13Mov, and is a better performer than 8Cr13Mov, then why not use 14C28N instead of 8Cr13Mov? If the Tenacious used 14C28N at $50, I wouldn't be having this conversation. I'd have one in my pocket!
I'm no expert on manufacturing
Then you have no business arguing that a knife costs more than you think it should. You have no basis for understanding what drives the cost of a knife.
I have yet to see any lies from Sal. That said I'm unsure what the point of this post is. Are we supposed to grab torches and pitchforks now?
By the way I've heard explanations about how certain countries keep their currency value artificially low to benefit the trade. Never heard one complaining about material costs. If I was to attempt to make the argument that someone was lying I'd want proof of the lies to include in the presentation and this one for sure has none.
I will say when Spyderco makes a knife with XYZ steel you can bet it is made of XYZ steel. I have never had a bad heat treat from a Spyderco knife. Wherever Spyderco has a knife made it is Spyderco that QC's it and warranty's it. I have almost 3 decades of carrying and using Spydercos too.
Joe
Absolutely. This thread is bunk. You can believe Spyderco’s steel designations. Ganzo and most other Chinese manufacturers - nope.
Ganzo 440C is not 440C.
![]()
![]()
Recycled Hyundai fenders is my guess. It sure ain’t 440C.
This is the only Ganzo in my house. Why? My ol lady wanted it. I wouldn’t allow that trash in my home otherwise.