- Joined
- May 7, 2001
- Messages
- 921
I can only say that, I own a goodly number of Spyderco's knives. Well built and reasonably priced cutting tools. I routinely use them hard and occasionally take them apart for maintenance. I've never had a problem with any of them which necessitated a warranty claim (speaks to their overall quality) so I have no direct experience dealing with their W&R services. With few exceptions, the feedback I've seen is extremely positive - if not stellar - with respect to Spyderco's customer service.
It seems to me, in its broadest context, the ambiguity of the warranty language is a CS issue. Good CS in this case would seem to suggest the need to eliminate said ambiguity and provide warranty-specific clarification (and peace of mind) for those of us capable of disassembling/maintaining our Spyderco knives without damaging them.
That said, I for one appreciate the OP's query and request for clarification. He's entitled to such as a customer. IMHO however, some of the responses to this rather straight-forward inquiry seem a little over-wrought.
It seems to me, in its broadest context, the ambiguity of the warranty language is a CS issue. Good CS in this case would seem to suggest the need to eliminate said ambiguity and provide warranty-specific clarification (and peace of mind) for those of us capable of disassembling/maintaining our Spyderco knives without damaging them.
That said, I for one appreciate the OP's query and request for clarification. He's entitled to such as a customer. IMHO however, some of the responses to this rather straight-forward inquiry seem a little over-wrought.