- Joined
- Sep 22, 2003
- Messages
- 13,182
We were most insistent on 1/8th stock. My first prototype was convex ground from 5/32 stock, and the manufacturer picked up on that for the initial production prototypes, as seen at shows and shown in the pictures. Thing is, with a full grind an a distal taper, 5/32 works nicely, not too heavy and not to thick, but stick a scandi grind on it and you trade off too much real world functionality. Scandi grinds don't batton cut green wood as well as a full grind and thicker blades are worse than thinner. Slicing of food will be better with a thinner blade, as will slicing of any fiberous material. Finally there is the overall weight. I believe that if you are going to pack additional steel, it needs to offer something, like chopping ability. Thicker scandis only seem to offer prying strength, and we all know that the arguement of whether you pry with a knife or not can go on a while!
I couldn't agree more with you there Claycomb. I have a lot of thicker bushcraft knifes but the 1/8" ones are the ones I use all the time. The thicker ones are just not that good for slicing stuff and overly heavy. I've batoned a lot of stuff w/ my Skookum 1/8" and no problems with it doing what I want.