Those are big wood bites with the SURV9 Dave... Did you re-profile the edge since you got it?
Just got this last week: RJ Martin Blackbird (one of 20 made, plus 10 of the smaller Raven, similar but with a much lower secondary grind line: Looks nowhere near as good imho): 10.5" blade, and it really does measure this on the dime for a change! (Even the super-precise Vaugh Neeley SA9, quoted as 9.5", and is actually 9 5/16", and this seems intended):
Mine looks more satin than these two:
Quite a bit of damage from the Kydex on this one...:
It was initially offered at $2100, then was sold, but apparently the deal did not come through. For a while I thought it was gone (mine is #12), but then I came upon it by accident on Ebay long after the sale apparently fell through... It was not as easy to find as labeled now, and would not come up on my usual "Survival Knife" search on Ebay... I was searching for something completely different when I saw it...: It was now down to $1700
with a best offer option: My $1500 offer proved enough... I think it's a real bargain for what I stated before was my "Grail Knife"... I've seen them offered at as high as US $2400...
Photos cannot do justice to the stunning visual impact this knife makes... The Neeley SA9 (and most others, except for the really huge broad-blade Martin SURV9 I suppose) seems like a mere toy in comparison... The RJ's sheath is just kydex with no nylon lining inside (the nylon is only on the outside), but despite bare plastic inner surfaces, it fits so nicely it barely does any marring on the blade: A very minor "haze" near the rear left secondary grind line (I've seen #1, and it gets scratched much more on the flats, #3 is much worse still on the left hollow grind, a wide mid-hollow "haze" going all the way...). To my surprise Kydex does not scratch my blade much at all, only very small, rare and discrete "haze" marks, and, most important, it avoids contacting the edge perfectly, better than leather... The surface damage could worsen with ambient dirt compared to leather, but for now, most leather sheaths seem more blade-aggressive than this particular Kydex sheath...
The edge is around 13° per side, on a 1 mm (0.040") thick bevel base (A Randall Model 14 or Model 12 is much thinner, at 0.5 mm or 0.020", but this is still much better than the Neeley SA9 at a clumsy 1.5 mm or 0.060", and this even after much angle reduction to 13-14°, from the absurd original 30° +): The RJ's edge is a rough angle/width match to how a Chris Reeves Jereboam's came new out of the box (which I consider marginal, but passable): Despite this, it feels much sharper than the Reeves was, because the edge on the Reeves was polished on a slightly slack belt, making it slightly "out of flat" on its bevel sides, and the edge bevel angle opened up considerably towards the tip: On the RJ Martin, the edge is dead-flat on its sides, and stays close to the straight edge angle all the way to the point... The perfection of the edge is such that the only thing I felt it needed was a tiny bevel on each side at the very tip of the point, to thin the point's bevels as viewed from the top... This is in the same vein to what SOG does on the point of its SOG Bowies...
The only modifications I did to the sheath where as follows: I removed the leg strap: Shortened it, folded this thick nylon strap over a 4" Dia-Sharp coarse stone, which was glued inside the strap's fold. I then glued some Velcro "hook" surface to the outside: The "encased" hone now can just be "applied" to the front of the sheath, since the entire front of the Kydex sheath's nylon outer lining is a velcro "loop" surface... This basically adds a neat rectangular nylon "stone pouch" to the front. It worked very well and looks beautiful, even better than just the sheath alone... It came with no removable pouches for some reason...
Handle diameter is about 1 mm less than the Randall with its handle wrapped with 350 lbs cord: The difference in handle confort is huge, which seems to indicate the wrapped Randall slightly oversteps some threshold limit of my particular hand... Inner handle compartment is slightly smaller in diameter, and deeper, than Randall (much less deep than Neeley), but note that this is despite
much thinner cord wrapping on the RJ Martin, so the tubing walls are much thicker... Despite these thick walls, the knife balances one inch ahead of the guard, which is way better than the Neeley SA9's guard balance... This makes me think the entire handle tubing is aluminium, as well as the buttcap...
The sawback design seems initially virtually identical to the Robert Parrish "Survivor", but comparing now the teeth of the Parrish in photos, it is clear the RJ Martin teeth are slightly reduced in vertical height, compared to the Parrish ones:
In person the RJ Martin teeths are quite aggressive, and they do not seem compromised by their lower height. To further enhance the combat use of the knife, they are reversed so as to not impede blade withdrawal... This makes this knife the only Survival Knife whose sawback does not really impede any of its major functions...
The "reversed" saw is 5" long exactly, vs 5.5" on the Neeley SA9: It would be interesting to see which one performs better on wood, but I will not have the courage to try any time soon...
The lack of any choil in the ricasso further enhances the combat aspect (although highly theoretical at 10.5"!), but at the cost of a lot of weight... Compared to its enormous size, the knife still does not feel heavy at all, but it is heavier... I would say the Chris Reeves Jereboam, despite being lighter, still feels "heavier per size", if that makes sense... Much of the RJ's weight can be attributed to the guard, which is my only objection to the knife's design: It could have been smaller and thinner, especially the thickness of it... That guard however confounded some of my apprehensions: By being oversized, it "hooks" exceptionallly well to the pant's upper belt edge, and allows very confortable inside-the-pants carry, with no movement at all... In fact, this 10.5" blade is more confortable to carry concealed for me than the 8.75" Chris Reeves Jereboam: It seems the worst thing a sheath can do is be a "semi square tip": Either be thin and fully square, or thick and fully rounded, but not in between...
The nylon sheath cover was given my usual treatment of superglueing all the stitches, then painting black the occasional white glue fumes.
The blade's clip design is very interesting: It is simply the spine dropped, with a flat back, so it is a "clipped" drop point, not a true bowie clip, but with a half-moon "cut-out" into the dropped spine that is as deep as possible, to allow using its edge as a "chopping" implement: It is fairly sharp by itself... The lack of a "true" clip grind means that, past the "cut-out" edge, the point goes back to a full "flat spine", which is very beneficial to batoning, and makes the point stronger, while still maintaining the option of an edge-saving chopping implement for smaller branches... I would say this is the best Survival Knife clip design I have ever seen: The dropped sharpened clip is usually, at best, a pure combat feature, of little use for chopping, and it usually makes the batoning option far less efficient, by chewing up the baton: This design improves both problems, with no real compromise to its combat ability...
This knife is a revelation in many ways: To my mind it disproves the notion that knives over 10" are impractical. I used to dislike broad blades, but the chopping performance must surely be worth it, and the thin functional sheath makes it seems like a reasonable-sized item once sheathed (taking it out is a shock to the senses each and every time)... Broad knives also seem less "dense" in weight per unit of size than narrower ones...
I never would have thought that a knife could instantly feel like it is easily worth $1500, but this one leaves absolutely no doubt, and for things not directly related to its outstanding size or design: The symmetry of the all the grinds is flawless. Even the secondary grind lines are slightly curved in a symmetrical way that seems controlled and intentional (I would have preferred them straight like on the Neeley, but they are nice enough). More than that, the transition between the surfaces is so crisp it litterally has to be seen to be believed... On the Neeley SA9, which is a match in the crispness of execution, every grind is perfect and incredibly crisp, but the actual grind work is obscured by bead-blasting: Here the grinding work is left out in the open, and it is just a joy to look at...
The biggest practical problem of this knife is the likely hysteria it would cause anywhere you would pull it out... It seems from another world... Yet, unlike most oversized wallhangers, it really is completely rational and functional in every aspect: There is not a hint of fantasy in any of its details... To most however, it will look more like a Survival Knife Zeus would carry in his fight against Typhon...
Gaston