According to
an article published in Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in 2006, Emerson sold $10 million knives in 2005. Now let's say on average each Emerson knife sold for $200, which means a total of about 50,000 pieces were sold in 2005. That's A LOT of knives and I tend to believe only a very small percentage of those knives were purchased by folks here.
Then, is it safe to assume that the majority of those Emerson knives went to Military, Rescuers, LEOs, and such? I imagine those people probably won't buy multiple knives with each costing $50 or more, but their population is huge. If I were one of them and I buy only one knife in five years, I would not care about a 10% annual price increase.
How about other brands like Benchmade, ZT, and Spyderco? Are their main users/customers also from Military, LEOs, and such?
I guess the points (not necessarily facts) I am trying to make are:
- There is a much larger population of "expensive" knives (Spyderco, Benchmade, ZT, Emerson, etc.)
- The majority of them didn't, don't, and won't buy multiples of such knives in a year or over years
- As such, the annual price increase as we've seen will not affect their knife purchase decision.