I agree. I am personally attracted to the WSK design, but have a hard time finding this design to replace the tools I carry. Prejudice can be found in any circles and the knife communities are not immune. Again, I like the looks and concept of the WSK, but don't ever expect to use one; just not my style or skill set (but it's always fun to experiment!). I do like the fact that one's ideas, philosophies and experiences can be forged into such a unique knife like the WSK; I'm reminded of Spivey's Sabertooth design and others that fall out of the "norm". Traditional designs can inbreed prejudice, but I think it's important to remain grounded in the fact that the "tool" is secondary to the individual's skill and experience. Someone who could master the WSK to its full potential could most likely make do with a Mora or even a razor blade. Most pragmatic knife users wouldn't consider designs like the WSK, but there are several who see the design as a challenge vice an object of ridicule. Most knife designers, such as Bryan Breeden, know what works for them but still look to expand their experience and skills, continuing to seek optimum or even niche tools. My father is the perfect example of pragmatism to the extreme; he's used the same hunting knife and rifle for the past 40+ years...they work well enough and he's well versed in their use. He would think something like the WSK is a gimmick or a joke. Others try to see through the designer's eyes and put their experiences to the test. For some of us, knives like the WSK create a challenge whereas for others it generates a little animosity. To each his own, but I still enjoy and appreciate the controversy of such designs even though they don't appeal to me or don't pique my pragmatic interests.ROCK6