I don't think that is it at all. I have been on long waiting lists in the past and am on two right now. It is part of the game sometimes. That is not what this is about for me at all.
You ask "why all the constant drama?" and "I guess I just don't understand the motivation." My involvement here comes from a serious concern over S!Ks business practices and the stability of the company. I was a supporter of S!K for a long time, and advocated for the company in GBU and other forums. However, the unprofessionalism and number of red flags regarding how the company is being run make me regret this.
I have an MBA, a 17 year history in management in corp-America, and now 7 years running my own small business. You can write me off as a keyboard commando looking for attention if you want, but I spent a significant part of my career doing business development and evaluating acquisition targets. The problems with S!K business are significant and obvious, and becoming more so as time goes on. I will be VERY happy if I am wrong, but if I am not a lot of people are going to get burned and I am trying to spread the word to look out. There are more than a few loyal S!K advocates that try to squash any comment about S!K that is not positive, and I think it is time to make sure that a message of caution about S!K gets out to potential customers.
I said this earlier, but will say it again; if Skyler, the rest of the "haters" and I are so wrong, why are the S!K supporters not pointing out the inaccuracies in our arguments? Why all the attacks on the messengers or attempts to change the focus of the conversation? Why are you making this personal and not willing to discuss the facts? Why not explain why S!K is a stable company and why it is not a big deal that have not achieved most of the goals of the "starter program." Why not explain why the constantly increasing lead times should not be a concern and how this business model is not a house of cards that is just one gust of wind short of toppling. I am not being sarcastic here; if we are wrong, please point out where the error in our reasoning exists. I have nothing personal against Guy, Ellie or any of the S!K supporters, and would not be disappointed to be shown that I am wrong and how S!K has a clear path to becoming a stable going concern.
I spent a lot of time on the S!K sub forum, and sincerely like a lot of you guys. I have said more than once that it is one of the more pleasant places on BladeForums.com, and I don't want to offend you guys. I do think that more than a few of you have lost your objectivity, and are missing some pretty obvious red flags. I too really like my S!K knives (I own 3), but it is painfully obvious to me that Guy and Ellie just don't have the tools to manage this organization. They might be really nice, hard working people with a great vision for their company, but imho they are screwing up in a big way and need to be called on it.
I wish you all the best and sincerely mean no disrespect. However, I feel strongly about this and will continue to present my position until S!K straightens out their business or ceases operations.