- Joined
- Dec 27, 2010
- Messages
- 6,852
I really don't care either way. I'm happy with my Manix knives. They have served me well for a long time. I do find it strange that you are so concerned about proving yourself right.
And, if you had bothered reading at all, including, say, the post with text in bold, you'd find that I'm no different. I like my Manix 2's (heck, if you were enough of a stand-up guy to actually do some research before calling someone a liar, you'd know that it's my FAVORITE Spydie, and one of my all time favorite knives) and I like Spyderco. But nobody calls me a liar. As I said, if you want to call me a liar, come to Colorado and have the balls to do it to my face.
Anyways, I'm done with the Spyderco topic. Take it for whatever it's worth to you. I hadn't meant for this to go off-topic. Someone else had mentioned that the Manix 2 was a hard-use knife that could take as much abuse as a Cold Steel knife, and I took it upon myself to prove it, because I thought, based on Barry's account, that that would be an easy task. Does that mean that I don't like my Manix 2? No. I love it. It's one of my very favorite folders, up there with my Gun Hammer and Ritter Griptilian with custom handles, and one of 3 knives I carry on a regular basis.
But the lock isn't up to serious abuse like Cold Steel's folders are. At the end of the day, I'm pretty sold on Cold Steel having the strongest lock out there. I don't like their handle designs, and I don't much like the style of lock, so I'll probably never own a CS folder myself. I have no need for a knife that will stab through the hood of a car. I still kinda think that the Manix 2 could do that, and since I've already broken mine, I might give it a try. But in terms of straight up toughness, I'm now convinced the Manix 2 doesn't belong in the same category. I think the Jeep vs Porsche analogy was a good one, really.