- Joined
- Feb 28, 2011
- Messages
- 27,506
"most knife tasks don't stress the lock..."
So by that logic, some do. And those circumstances are where a lock is beneficial. And if having a lock is beneficial, I'm sure you'd probably want it to work like it's supposed to. The problem is that those circumstances are really not that prevalent so locks aren't always tested. And since locks aren't always tested in the real world, people devise tests for the lock. And here we are. Some people don't ever need a lock and cry about people saying a lock should work. That causes people to say things "well then why have a lock at all" and the cycle continues. What it comes down to is if the knife has a lock, it should work. If it doesn't, then it should be returned and repaired or replaced. If it happens quite a bit, then there's a problem with manufacturing. Knife nuts should stick together and demand the best quality possible, not defend the companies doing it. They're a company and do what their customers demand if they want to stay in business. As long as they have a base of people that defend inconsistent locking mechanisms, then it will continue. If they have a customer base demand that they fix the problem, then it will be fixed. There's no personal vendetta or agenda or anything like that. People who want to care about ZT and want to like ZT want ZT to fix the issue. Some others go so overboard that they're OK even with all the video proof showing the failures.
I don't disagree, but the number of people doing the testing is miniscule compared to the number of knives sold. I absolutely want the strongest, most reliable lock (that doesn't totally compromise ease of use) that I can get, but I also accept the fact that the sample size for lock tests just sucks. Edge retention is the flip side, you generally see a much stronger consensus on edge retention in different steels, models and geometry not because we have that much more access to really great testing, but because most people that buy knives will cut various media and get at least some feel for how it holds an edge. Basically, the resting isn't necessarily better, but the sample size is much, much larger.
Don't get me wrong, I shy away from locks I view as subpar, but I also accept that my conclusions on that may be deeply flawed due to the small sample size and lack of relevant data.