You people

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm curious why no one is discussing kilgars post? raises a lot of questions and is relevant to this whole plethora of bickering in this thread

Because it was really long and I don't know the distinction people are using for differentiation between "copy" and "counterfeit". For reference is the Chinese knife I posted a copy or a counterfeit Sebenza25? Is either one okay?
 
So what is this?

ooswUOHh.jpg
 
The "morality of individuals who would defend companies guilty of design theft". Geez. You've got get all the way past convincing everyone that there was theft before you can decide that anyone is defending them and that makes those people immoral. I'll bet you would have been handy at a witch trial.


I can see this issue either way. I just refuse to see it both ways at the same time. Either kick the Schrade/United Cutlery crap off the sponsor sites and ban discussion of Microtech, or let people have their SRM knives that are original designs.

Right now your side is just calling for a morality of convenience.

Your grammar and logic are starting to parallel each other, I found it very hard to read your first sentence.

You call for proof to be supplied by others before you believe anything they post as truth, yet you call for everyone to believe everything you say as truth even though you don't supply any proof. After I post this you'll just ask for proof of what I just said and when it is supplied you'll just deny it as you always do.
 
So, nobody wants a part of this. I failed.

In a way I understand, but I will always believe that the war to educate people on why this matters needs to be fought right here with customers and not with politicians.

All I can do is present what I have been given.

And I know, if we are not in the industry then why should we care?

Because, this, and things like this are effecting every industry, and eventually will effect what you do, or what someone you love does, if it hasn't already.

http://www.akti.org/news/contending-with-counterfeits/

Copies are a worldwide problem. Some places it's even worse that the US due to demand outstripping supply.

This is also not some sort of case if youthfull hi jinx with a consumer item. Counterfeit electronics are in aircraft and clone medical supplies are in hospitals.

This should not be a topic of debate on this site except for in W&C where scorn can be heaped upon the cheerleaders.
 
So, nobody wants a part of this. I failed.

In a way I understand, but I will always believe that the war to educate people on why this matters needs to be fought right here with customers and not with politicians.

All I can do is present what I have been given.

And I know, if we are not in the industry then why should we care?

Because, this, and things like this are effecting every industry, and eventually will effect what you do, or what someone you love does, if it hasn't already.

http://www.akti.org/news/contending-with-counterfeits/

Here is another one from CRK; http://www.chrisreeve.com/counterfeits.html
 
Copies are a worldwide problem. Some places it's even worse that the US due to demand outstripping supply.

This is also not some sort of case if youthfull hi jinx with a consumer item. Counterfeit electronics are in aircraft and clone medical supplies are in hospitals.

This should not be a topic of debate on this site except for in W&C where scorn can be heaped upon the cheerleaders.

This whole thing goes well beyond counterfeits, and as you pointed out, knives.

It makes me sad to see Americans fighting Americans about the validity of cloning American products.

I guess this is where a materialistic and consumerist society ends up....
 
Because it was really long and I don't know the distinction people are using for differentiation between "copy" and "counterfeit". For reference is the Chinese knife I posted a copy or a counterfeit Sebenza25? Is either one okay?

Read his long post.

A copy is something that looks similar. a counterfeit is a direct clone of said product passed off as an original.

Counterfeits aren't okay in my book. A copy can be subjective. The SRM 7010 looks similar to a sebenza, so it could definitely be seen as a copy.

Every knife could be considered a copy, they have handles and blades. All cars have wheels and engines, they could be copies. Anyone who makes jeans could be considered a copy of Levis. Any restuarant who makes burgers could be considered a copy of Mcdonalds lol.

Everything we use is a copy in some way or another. Look at televisions, phones, computers, clothing, jewelry. etc etc.

So what copies people deem ok and not ok, is subjective.

EDIT:

Can't believe I used my 1000th post on this :p
 
Appreciate it Bill.

I feel like words are not gonna help here. It's gonna have to be felt by each and every person in whatever they do to maybe understand.

No problem

You can lead a horse to water...
 
Appreciate it Bill.

I feel like words are not gonna help here. It's gonna have to be felt by each and every person in whatever they do to maybe understand.

This doesn't have anything to do with the way all companies parody each other's technology. This is counterfeit, which is not in the OP.
 
There is a whole lot of weird on that, including 14 year design patents. It's a 20 year patent. Patents aren't renewable. Technology, knives, whatever.

Okay then. Explain why. Not just what is in that thread but also the screen shot I posted. Set....Go!
 
Full counterfeits are a no go for me, patents or no patents
The next level down on copies does get murkier, and the exact copy of even a particular part doesn't make it easier, as well as when do you stop getting upset over that parts copying- after patent expiration, when the patent doesn't apply?-lots of factors to consider. Everyone will have to choose for themselves exactly where they want to draw the line. I leave it to the makers and manufacturers to sort out the legal end. Legal aside you still get to decide where you stand. Not everything that there isn't a law against is right. I probably want beat on someone with a copy, like I would for a counterfeit, but just like not paying PP fees, you may be somewhat tolerated, but I wouldn't brag about it.
 
Last edited:
So just to refresh, the original poster (thatoneguy1) of this thread is done with Blade Forums because he commented in a different thread where a different guy asked for opinions of a cheap copy knife and "thatoneguy1" didn't like the opinions being given?

Ok. Bye!!! If you don't like it, don't participate.

RX, since you're the continual driving force for page after page after page of spiraling commentary, maybe it's time to take a break. You've made it clear that you support the world of cheap knockoffs. Not everyone does which is evident. What more is here for you to "explain".

Please leave the Wright Brother's plane out of your answer lol.
 
Read his long post.

A copy is something that looks similar. a counterfeit is a direct clone of said product passed off as an original.

Counterfeits aren't okay in my book. A copy can be subjective. The SRM 7010 looks similar to a sebenza, so it could definitely be seen as a copy.

Every knife could be considered a copy, they have handles and blades. All cars have wheels and engines, they could be copies. Anyone who makes jeans could be considered a copy of Levis. Any restuarant who makes burgers could be considered a copy of Mcdonalds lol.

Everything we use is a copy in some way or another. Look at televisions, phones, computers, clothing, jewelry. etc etc.

So what copies people deem ok and not ok, is subjective.

EDIT:

Can't believe I used my 1000th post on this :p

Your complete and massive over simplification of knives and automobiles all being copies of each other is absurd. No one would ever confuse with or call a Dodge Challenger a Ferrari 458, but they are both 2 door, 4 wheel, rear wheel drive V8 automobiles that run on gasoline so one must be a copy of the other....correct?

2016-LDT-New-Sebenza-25-Folding-Blade-Knife-CPM-S35VN-Blade-TC4-Titanium-Handle-Knife-Tactical.jpg_640x640.jpg


So is this knives similarity to a Sebenza 25 subjective? Is it "merely" a copy since it doesn't have a CR logo, or is it a reprehensible clone? Does an item have to be passed off as the original to be bad? If that knife is sold as a "Happy Knife Co. Silver Locker" is it ok then?
 
The moral of the story is; It's OK to make a direct copy of someone else's intellectual property as long as you put your own name on it..That is what sets the counterfeiters apart from the "innovators".

Got it
 
So just to refresh, the original poster (thatoneguy1) of this thread is done with Blade Forums because he commented in a different thread where a different guy asked for opinions of a cheap copy knife and "thatoneguy1" didn't like the opinions being given?

Ok. Bye!!! If you don't like it, don't participate.

RX, since you're the continual driving force for page after page after page of spiraling commentary, maybe it's time to take a break. You've made it clear that you support the world of cheap knockoffs. Not everyone does which is evident. What more is here for you to "explain".

Please leave the Wright Brother's plane out of your answer lol.


do you shop at knifecnter or Blade HQ cuz if you do then you're supporting dealers who sell copies
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top