Stu Gatz said:I have not posted regarding this issue yet, in part because I am not personally involved, and because many other members seem to be focused on it.
However, the concept that a member, moderator, or owner/director of a forum would ban a member for legitimate expression of dissatisfaction over another members failure to deliver on a product SCREAMS of complacency, collusion, pay-off, corruption, and whatever else the imagination may come up with.![]()
This mentioned with a certain degree of continued courtesy to the members and administration of BB.
This does make one somewhat suspicious...
All the very best,
Stuart
boy thats the truth.
i dont understand the logic of the folks who run BB, just makes no sense to me, but i'm just a country boy what would i know.
does make ya wonder though, WTF???