Hey,
Ive made and sold 50+ knives with procut and had very very consistent results. Phenomenal edge retention and edge stability. 1550/cryo/300 comes to 66.5-67 every time, and for prybars (ive made 60 or so) 1700/cryo/ 400 comes to 61.5 every time. Just my guess, but delam and cracking comes from uneven temps when quenching not anything from the mill. My guess is they overheated the outside of the steel (probably using a forge) and didn't properly soak the steel and that caused the delam and cracking. Also why they poked it 20 times to get a hardness reading, they were probably getting numbers all over the place which is really unprofessional. Thats them trying to find one poke with a number that was acceptable so they could say it made spec. They knew something was wrong from the first 4 pokes, either they still have decarb or its under hardened.
Update:
A few comments and questions about Bos I'll try to address.
-Yes this was Bos's first Procut order.
-I did send Pops instruction sheet.
-Paul said he had questions about it, but followed the instructions.
-Paul runs stainless and high alloy, air hardened steels though their vacuum furnaces. He runs steels like this through laboratory grade ovens, limited to 12" Blade lengths.
-Quench in Parks 50
-cryo according to Pops instructions.
-the increase of inspection dimples was He said they checked at every stage. Especially because this was first batch.
When I was talking to him he seemed like he took good notes, and was well documented with My blades. He did them.
I later gave Larrin, Pauls personal number. Larrin tried calling right before Christmas, but didn't get in touch yet. I'll try as well but with all the holidays Idk What people's schedule is?
Comments.
Larrin and I have messaged some. He asked me some questions.
I saw a preliminary write up he's done with his findings.
It's not as clear cut as I figured it would be.
Idk IF he is going public with the information (on his website) or if the testing was done privately for Pop's?
So I'll keep What I know out of it, & not posted here yet, unless Larrin posts.
I'm not sure for who's eyes it was meant for.
I cant/won't speak for him. Obviously I wouldn't understand it to the levels he does.
I'm thinking he has done lots of different tests, and more than what he showed me. Perhaps.
-It sounds like he has an understanding of What might be happening.
Imo, it's not as clear as the How part works into the equation?
I had a couple questions he is going to pursue. Look into.
I need to see if Paul still has the test pieces I sent him.
Larrin wanted more samples. I have a couple more also to send to him.
Long story short.......still digging, collecting data.