please gentlemen what has it to do with international ?
i don't understand why the fundamentals of a good transaction should change when a good crosses a frontier. is there any good reason for that ? france is no third world, we have postal services, not the fastest in the world but as reliable as anywhere else. i've been buying knives for years, from japan, from USA, from europe, i've had very late delivery but beside this one only one loss, and the seller (US) ate the loss like it should be done, like i would do if i ever have a lost parcel coming from me.
any way, as much as i disagree with this method, if he had clearly stated that i had to assume all the risk i would probably have chosen a fully insured postage. and the situation would not be what it is .... but please ... is this the best path really ?
Well yes, it is always spelled out in advance. My sale threads have it (and its re-iterated over email) and, in trade, I spell it out as well. The other side of the trade ALWAYS gets some proof that the item went out,
The reason for doing this is that a relatively large number of packages are stolen by customs upon entry into the country (this happens relatively frequently in the EU).
If its spelled out in advance then what is the problem with the policy? It seems to me that if you don't like the policy in advance of the trade then its your prerogative not to trade to with me. Point is that you know exactly where you stand.