The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
It just depends why you think ricassos came about in the first place. They appear to be a solution to fighting with blades with cross guards, where the guard made sharpening more difficult and blocking another blade with the guard was likely to cause chipping of the edge where it goes into the guard. Removing the edge removes that weakness. The Bowie knife was intended as a weapon - like a short cutlass.
Once you have a ricasso you can choose to put your fingers on it, but it seems like we aren't talking about longsword technique or fighting knives with guards. For field/utility/bushcraft/hunting knives that don't have guards, the ricasso just becomes an uncomfortably thin section of handle with no wood or bolster on it. Like the later MACVSOG knife, I think those Randalls are pretty, I just don't understand what outdoor technique requires a large guard, which then has to be addressed with a finger choil. And I'm not saying that finger choils are the problem - ricassos on blades that don't need guards seems like the source of all of this.
However, style is style, and if you like the look, so be it.
As far as sharpening goes, I don't see why you can't put a small choil on a Scandi type knife, if that is what is desired. A 1/16" notch isn't going to make the knife hard to use.
That isn't a choil. It's a grooved ricasso, which prevents you getting cut the way a finger choil would. This design makes sense to me because your finger isn't inside the plunge.
This is a big knife where you can also put your index finger right next to the edge for fine work. You just don't have to put it on part of the primary bevel.
![]()
Everybody can pick whatever kind of knife they want, but if the question is "is the finger choil the only way to get your index finger really close to the edge" the answer is "no". Finger grooves adjacent to the plunge and Scandi style handles do the same thing.
That is exactly what some of us said they were for and it is the way I use them. Unfortunately it has nothing to do with the OP as we don't know what knife he was using or how he was using it. I've just never found my self getting repeatedly cut by my knives when using one with a choil![]()
I think the Bowie-knife originated from a butcher's knife, it already had the recessed handle...
Y'know, I'm describing it that way but would like someone to give me a more appropriate term for a knife with a forward/leading blade heel or with the tang/handle recessed from the edge, like a standard chef's knife.
Anyway, the origin was described to me as a butcher's knife with an added guard, but the guard far enough below the choil to allow a finger to seat with the guard between the index and middle fingers. Thus a butcher's knife gained the attributes of a combat knife - you can still hold it close to the blade heel for certain types of cutting tasks, but you can also 'choke back' behind the guard for other tasks. The guard protects the hand from sliding forward onto the blade-edge in thrusts. something that the choil or ricasso doesn't accomplish, but the latter provides options for some closer grips in carving and tip-work....
Anyone else worry or have at least thoughts of choils like on the Bark River III? MANY have a similar set-up.
http://www.barkriverknives.com/index/series/search-rescue-2/bravo-3/
I have had my finger touch the edge on other knives ( near blade) and get cut a few times. One I can think of, cut me 2x in 1 day from normal use.
I have an average size hand. Im a big person, heck...1/2 bigfoot.I hold plenty tight.I dont "sissy grip" it.
One tiny slip and so much damage.
Somthing like this is SO much better and safer !
http://www.whiteriverknives.com/collections/backpacker/products/backpacker-orange
So I am curious. ( I do not make knives) It seems like very little cost and effort to make a safer design.
Perhaps do not sharpen the blade to a point next to the choil U shape groove.
Great, big forums like this have a zillion posts, odd that nobody else talks about this.
To be fair, the coffee was hotter than it should've been, others had gotten burned badly by it (and filed complaints, over 500 if I remember correctly), she got 3rd-degree burns from it, and as soon as that lawsuit happened every fast food company (not just McD's) changed the standard temperature of their coffee by dropping it 20 degrees.
Sure, coffee is supposed to be hot, but she had a very valid case that everyone acknowledged was a big problem.
I don't think finger choils are that kind of problem, most knife users don't file lawsuits when they nick their fingers by not paying attention and grabbing too close to the edge of the blade.
E7 would not be the first person on the forum to keep a "problem" knife's identity to himself. I think that's fine.
Yup, it is fine if he doesn't want to share information important to answering his question. But that would then beg the question what the point of the thread is? If people want to argue about what a choil is or if it is useful, fine, by all means, start a thread about it! No need to get this thread shut down with arguments not related to helping the OP not cut himself multiple times in a day. And unfortunately, no one else is learning about what a "ruff" design is or how it could lead to cutting ones self, with hopes of avoiding such designs or warrantying such flaws in the future. I think such information would be helpful to the community and directly related to the OP.
Just now on skype I showed the owner my exact knife. HE said " wow that NEVER should have been sent, that is rough, very rough,wow" Boxing mine up now, waiting on replacement, 2-3 days.
Fact is,people DO get cut.
I just don't know why he is ignoring questions instead of just saying he doesn't want to disclose the brand and model of the knife
I genuinely want to know what company skyped with him.
Also, it sounds like the company had good service, so what is there to hide?
People have questions, valid ones.
I do not want to bash the MFG,nor will I.
He isn't ignoring questions, you're ignoring him when he said, in reply to an earlier request: