I find this interesting. You have made several posts stating the Strider ripped off Emerson. Huh.
Huh, indeed. Have you shown anything to the contrary? It's a pity you haven't weighed in on the most essential point of all. Maybe it's getting lost in the posts.
Show me which makers before Ernest Emerson pioneered (much less popularized) the kiriha zukuri tanto combined with a straight clip back.
I've asked that several times and neither you nor anyone else on the entire forum has been able to answer that. Okay, Michelle, it's time to put up or, well, you know the rest.
"Ripping off" someone means you steal an idea/concept/design, etc., without permission, take credit for it, profit off of it, etc., with the end result being the person who was "ripped off" is usually pretty pissed off about it.
That depends on the person. You're making the incorrect assumption that all people behave in the exact same manner. Ernest Emerson is a class act. It would seem he's successful enough and "big" enough as a person to ignore the shameless and uncredited imitations of his work by Cold Steel, Strider, and dozens of import companies.
That doesn't change the fact that what they're all doing is wrong. If Lynn Thompson is scum for stealing a "Strider" design, then it's time Strider get tarred with the same brush because that blade design wasn't "theirs" in the first place.
SO, I am really confused at this point because Mick, Duane and Ernest are....... all friends. Not just that, they are in talks right now about a possible collaboration in the near future. How could that be?
Business and profit make for interesting partnerships. The US spent close to 40 years in a "cold war" with a communist nation. Communism was (and is) one of the greatest evils in modern history and responsible for the deaths of millions. At the same time, our greatest "trading partner" is a communist nation notorious for human rights violations.
"How could that be?"
You are taking umbrage and making accusations.... yet the person you feel has been done wrong, has no issue at all. Perception and assumption is an intersting thing.
So is arrogance and presupposition. Please show where Ernest Emerson publicly appointed you his personal spokeswoman. I don't visit all the threads and this is a big place. I must have missed the announcement. After that, please show how you are able to know, irrefutably, what Ernest Emerson
really thinks. Not what he publicly says out of professionalism (he isn't Lynn Thompson or Mick Strider), but what Ernest Emerson's private thoughts are about watching other companies make money off of his blade design without even giving him recognition for his innovation.
When you're done all of that, please show where I claimed that Ernest Emerson
did have an "issue" with being stolen from. I never said he did or didn't. I said other companies
were stealing his design. I never discussed how Mr. Emerson
felt about being stolen from because I know better than to make the mistake you did.
darkestthicket said:
Yours is another opinion. some of us happen to like Strider's Finish.
One is demonstrably over-priced, regardless of what finish you may personally like. Price comparison requires no subjective "opinion." One value is either greater than the other. Mechanical complexity and blade surface comparison are physical concepts. No opinion needed as one knife is more complex or one surface is smoother than the other.
So, let's compare. A Strider Mark 1 is a spearpoint blade with a straight, one piece "bar of steel" steel construction, and a length of cord for a handle. It has a heavy sandblasted finish. It costs $425.00 MSRP.
A Chris Reeves Project One is also a spearpoint blade, except that it has an incredibly complicated (from a machinist's point of view) handle that's hollow with a removable butt cap. In terms of of machining operations and skill, the Project One is an infinitely more complicated and difficult knife to make. It has a smooth, beadblasted finish and a black coating.. It costs $350 MSRP.
So the Strider is a dramatically simpler and easier knife to make, it has a rougher finish, and costs $75
more than the Chris Reeves. You were saying?