The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I built this from cardboard and it helped me to decide to get a red G-10 scale on my new XM-18 (Hinderer made)
![]()
Intellectual Property is Real Property!
Larceny, theft, robbery, stealing is wrong ethically.
Trust me when I say I am probably the cheapest mofo on this forum, and that's not just because the currency exchange rate. I ended up paying $36 for my Kershaw Scamp and almost $45 for my Kershaw Crown because of international shipping and customs duties. Those were still the cheapest quality knives I could afford. I still went ahead choosing them over a large number of Chinese fakes I could procure at less than half that. I have seen a Sebenza clone in a flea market that looked good enough to fool most people who have never seen or held a Sebenza and cost all of $15. I did not buy it.
Why? Well firstly I don't steal or buy stolen property. And IT BLOODY WELL IS stolen property. Secondly, the options for beautiful and beautifully made blades at prices I can afford exist and in significant numbers. The CRK clone actually had the engraved CRK logo on it. I avoid Sanremnu or whatever that is called because I am yet to see evidence that Chris Reeves has allowed the use of his design.
But a SRM 710/Mingren 910 Plus/Navy K507 isn't even in the same ballpark as a real CRK Sebenza.
You can't get that level of fit and finish and high-end materials without high costs and that's what his knives are all about.
I don't see how he'd be losing any customers. Rather, he may actually gain MORE customers (me included),
since people can purchase a nice "homage" piece from China and catch the bug.
I'm only talking about knives that are heavily inspired by an authentic knife, not the ones which are sold as the real thing but aren't (branded).
That's plain wrong imo, but using a design and doing something new yet similar with it,
which SRM and those brands do, (adding different features) is OK in my book.
I think it would be best to distinguish the different types of copies so as to minimize further confusion.
Please help me:
*Knockoffs (exactly the same design with logos and everything)
*Copies (very similar design, but with obvious differences and no logos etc.)
*Hybrid Copies (many popular designs mashed into one, with a bias toward one design)
*Redesign (homage) of another design which holds no patents
Are there any more categories?
Why buy fakes from disreputable companies when you can get excellent knives in the same price range? It doesn't make any sense.
Good post ! ^
1234,,,,,![]()
Dorito, I think you're misconstruing the argument against clones. Not all clones are necessarily evil. What makes it wrong isn't just that it happens to be cheap and shares design elements. It's copying the entire design and marketing using the original name, without consent from the parent company. Virtually all of your examples, outside of the Gucci bag knockoff, etc, don't really fall into that category. And for the record, I think that Gucci bag knockoffs, fake Rolexes, and the like, are just as wrong. I can categorically say I don't own any of those. I used to get a lot of clone airsoft guns, which are by and large, copies of the originals. Those were all sent to me free of charge for review, and while I gave them an honest rap, I don't own any of them any more--with one exception. I do still own a "clone" that took a great design, and actually improved on it. It's the same in many ways, but they improved on all of the design flaws in the original, and THAT, I think, is how a clone should be done. If you're going to reverse engineer something, then figure out what you don't like about it, and improve it, that's a whole different story.
im pretty sure you missed my point entirely. the average joe would throw down 400 for a basic 9mm and be content knowing that it will do the job if they get put in a bind, and then theres "elitist d-bags" like me who wanna shoot 1 1/2" groups at 25 yds so they go out and buy a Sig 210. i wasnt implying Ruger was a Sig copy, just a more budget minded pistol.
You sure have changed brother. Like I'm going to ask my wife & daughters if it's cool to buy knock off knives or their advice on any of my sporting goods purchases? Gucci bags? Estwing boots? WT*???
My father taught us to buy "gear" not stuff - when it came to hunting, fishing and wilderness items. Buy the best and it lasts a lifetime (maybe not always but you know what I mean).
I won't say as to whether or not I agree with the entire integrity argument, I will say that I agree with not asking women about their designer hand bags. Women are predatory shoppers. All they care about-truly-is showing off the name brand. There is no pride of ownership with women and designer clothes, to be honest. Most women purchase these items as a way of internal-gender competition. Thus, they only need to put the LV image out there and have other women believe-for a short period of time, even-that they own the genuine purse or handbag. I think men tend toward pride-of-ownership in a much greater capacity than do women. I would say the Rolex argument is much closer to the knife argument as mostly men purchase Rolex watches.
Intellectual Property is Real Property!
Larceny, theft, robbery, stealing is wrong ethically.
Trust me when I say I am probably the cheapest mofo on this forum, and that's not just because the currency exchange rate. I ended up paying $36 for my Kershaw Scamp and almost $45 for my Kershaw Crown because of international shipping and customs duties. Those were still the cheapest quality knives I could afford. I still went ahead choosing them over a large number of Chinese fakes I could procure at less than half that. I have seen a Sebenza clone in a flea market that looked good enough to fool most people who have never seen or held a Sebenza and cost all of $15. I did not buy it.
Why? Well firstly I don't steal or buy stolen property. And IT BLOODY WELL IS stolen property. Secondly, the options for beautiful and beautifully made blades at prices I can afford exist and in significant numbers. The CRK clone actually had the engraved CRK logo on it. I avoid Sanremnu or whatever that is called because I am yet to see evidence that Chris Reeves has allowed the use of his design.
<<removed....ahh forget it.>>
Obviously there are exceptions to every rule.
No one needs Chris Reeve's permission. There are no design or utility patents on the Sebenza. SRM can produce all of the clones they want. As far as I could tell, CRK's trademarks are all expired too. Again, I didn't look too hard for trademark infringement as I think selling a fake Sebenza and marketing it as anything other than a "fake" or "Sebenza-style" knife is taking things too far since it results in people buying something that they never would have bought otherwise.
Well yes I guess if the patents have legally expired, he no longer needs to expressly permit anyone. Isn't it people who want a Sebenza and cant afford it who buy the Sanrenmu. If the Sanrenmu had an original design I doubt they would sell 20% of the knives they move today.No one needs Chris Reeve's permission. There are no design or utility patents on the Sebenza. SRM can produce all of the clones they want. As far as I could tell, CRK's trademarks are all expired too. Again, I didn't look too hard for trademark infringement as I think selling a fake Sebenza and marketing it as anything other than a "fake" or "Sebenza-style" knife is taking things too far since it results in people buying something that they never would have bought otherwise.