How do you guys feel about China copies?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I built this from cardboard and it helped me to decide to get a red G-10 scale on my new XM-18 (Hinderer made) :D

2012porsche911carreracabriolet-29-627x392.jpg
 
I've owned a Porsche 911. Great car!

Cutting out a knife to spec from cardboard in order to get an idea of how the handle will fit your hand,
how the blade shape will suit your needs and so on is actually very helpful if you can't fondle the real deal. Try it!
Interestingly, car designers make clay models of cars before making prototypes, so go figure.

I think it would be best to distinguish the different types of copies so as to minimize further confusion.
Please help me:

*Knockoffs (exactly the same design with logos and everything)
*Copies (very similar design, but with obvious differences and no logos etc.)
*Hybrid Copies (many popular designs mashed into one, with a bias toward one design)
*Redesign (homage) of another design which holds no patents

Are there any more categories?
 
Last edited:
Intellectual Property is Real Property!
Larceny, theft, robbery, stealing is wrong ethically.

Trust me when I say I am probably the cheapest mofo on this forum, and that's not just because the currency exchange rate. I ended up paying $36 for my Kershaw Scamp and almost $45 for my Kershaw Crown because of international shipping and customs duties. Those were still the cheapest quality knives I could afford. I still went ahead choosing them over a large number of Chinese fakes I could procure at less than half that. I have seen a Sebenza clone in a flea market that looked good enough to fool most people who have never seen or held a Sebenza and cost all of $15. I did not buy it.

Why? Well firstly I don't steal or buy stolen property. And IT BLOODY WELL IS stolen property. Secondly, the options for beautiful and beautifully made blades at prices I can afford exist and in significant numbers. The CRK clone actually had the engraved CRK logo on it. I avoid Sanremnu or whatever that is called because I am yet to see evidence that Chris Reeves has allowed the use of his design.

Good post ! ^



1234,,,,,:)
 
But a SRM 710/Mingren 910 Plus/Navy K507 isn't even in the same ballpark as a real CRK Sebenza.
You can't get that level of fit and finish and high-end materials without high costs and that's what his knives are all about.
I don't see how he'd be losing any customers. Rather, he may actually gain MORE customers (me included),
since people can purchase a nice "homage" piece from China and catch the bug.

I'm only talking about knives that are heavily inspired by an authentic knife, not the ones which are sold as the real thing but aren't (branded).
That's plain wrong imo, but using a design and doing something new yet similar with it,
which SRM and those brands do, (adding different features) is OK in my book.

I think there's a pretty big difference between a $7 SRM 710 and a real Sebenza. The SRM 710 doesn't have Sebenza markings or even pretend to be a Sebenza. It looks sort of like a small Sebenza, but the F&F, materials, tolerances, and quality really isn't there, despite what a ton of people on this site seem to think. Cheap stainless scales, cheap 8cr steel, cheap construction...I carried it a couple times and tossed it in a box. I paid around $5 for it so I guess I got what I paid for. I wanted to see what the fuss was about and honestly I don't really get it, but that's a topic for another thread.

Knives that copy logos and entire designs in order to pretend to be the real deal are examples of theft and I won't buy them. I can't afford CRK knives right now. Maybe I'll get one in the future, maybe not. I'd rather drop $120 on a nice ZT or Spyderco than support people putting out blatant fakes. I bought a Gayle Bradley, Military and ZT 0350 and didn't pay more than $120 for any of them. There are plenty of fantastic knives in the $100 range so I don't see the appeal of the so-called "high end" fakes. Chinese fakes are harmful to the knife community and hurt markers' business. Why buy fakes from disreputable companies when you can get excellent knives in the same price range? It doesn't make any sense.
 
I think it would be best to distinguish the different types of copies so as to minimize further confusion.
Please help me:

*Knockoffs (exactly the same design with logos and everything)
*Copies (very similar design, but with obvious differences and no logos etc.)
*Hybrid Copies (many popular designs mashed into one, with a bias toward one design)
*Redesign (homage) of another design which holds no patents

Are there any more categories?

^^ Clones: Exactly same design with no logos or non affiliated logos
 
Why buy fakes from disreputable companies when you can get excellent knives in the same price range? It doesn't make any sense.

Because to a lot of people, the design of the "fake" is more appealing than what is available at the same price.
I don't condone buying blatant knockoffs which attempt to be the real deal via deception. I do however have a copy of a Tai Pan and a real one.
A person must be completely ignorant though, to think that a new 15-dollar knife is authentic if the real one costs well over 300 dollars or whatever.

Here's a comparison:

taipancomparison.jpg
 
Dorito, I think you're misconstruing the argument against clones. Not all clones are necessarily evil. What makes it wrong isn't just that it happens to be cheap and shares design elements. It's copying the entire design and marketing using the original name, without consent from the parent company. Virtually all of your examples, outside of the Gucci bag knockoff, etc, don't really fall into that category. And for the record, I think that Gucci bag knockoffs, fake Rolexes, and the like, are just as wrong. I can categorically say I don't own any of those. I used to get a lot of clone airsoft guns, which are by and large, copies of the originals. Those were all sent to me free of charge for review, and while I gave them an honest rap, I don't own any of them any more--with one exception. I do still own a "clone" that took a great design, and actually improved on it. It's the same in many ways, but they improved on all of the design flaws in the original, and THAT, I think, is how a clone should be done. If you're going to reverse engineer something, then figure out what you don't like about it, and improve it, that's a whole different story.

You could be right about me misconstruing the anti-clone argument. When I think of 'Chinese Copies', I think of things along the lines of Sanrenmu or Ganzo knives - these knives are branded under their own names and are generally straight-forward about the materials and such they use, but frequently use designs or mechanisms which are identical to knives from other manufacturers.

For example, I just bought this Ganzo G704.

GANZO_G704_03.jpg


It's almost identical to the Benchmade 14205. I would say that it's a direct copy, or a clone.

HK14205Benchmade.jpg


(Apologies if these photos belong to you folks)

That's pretty much what I've been talking about in this thread. To me, that's an example of a direct clone/copy/knockoff, and I figured that's what the OP and most other folks were referring to.

EDIT: I guess a lot of folks are talking about items which are passed off as originals, sold for the price of originals, carry falsified logos and watermarks, etc. and may not even consider re-branded (or whatever term you'd like to use) knives like Sanrenmu or Enlan knives to be 'knockoffs'.

Also, as an aside, I've been farting around with this knife since I got it the other day and I'm pretty friggin' impressed. I've owned 180$ American knives that weren't this well made. I shredded a pop can with it the other day to see if the steel was liable to chip the way I found 8cr13 to do, and I was surprised to find that the edge held up quite well indeed. It was easy enough to sharpen, but isn't buttery-soft as I had feared. I don't have a very hard time believing it's made of 440c as advertised (thus far, anyway). Working the action a bunch has caused it to smooth out a little, to boot, so it's quite pleasant to use so far. Hope to put it through its paces at work next week and see how it holds up doing actual chores. :thumbup:
 
Last edited:
im pretty sure you missed my point entirely. the average joe would throw down 400 for a basic 9mm and be content knowing that it will do the job if they get put in a bind, and then theres "elitist d-bags" like me who wanna shoot 1 1/2" groups at 25 yds so they go out and buy a Sig 210. i wasnt implying Ruger was a Sig copy, just a more budget minded pistol.

I understood your point, it just has no-viable-place here. You can throw around whatever analogies your want, but it doesn't mean they pertain to the discussion. We aren't talking about cheap alternatives, we are discussing knock-offs and fakes.
 
You sure have changed brother. Like I'm going to ask my wife & daughters if it's cool to buy knock off knives or their advice on any of my sporting goods purchases? Gucci bags? Estwing boots? WT*???

My father taught us to buy "gear" not stuff - when it came to hunting, fishing and wilderness items. Buy the best and it lasts a lifetime (maybe not always but you know what I mean).

I won't say as to whether or not I agree with the entire integrity argument, I will say that I agree with not asking women about their designer hand bags. Women are predatory shoppers. All they care about-truly-is showing off the name brand. There is no pride of ownership with women and designer clothes, to be honest. Most women purchase these items as a way of internal-gender competition. Thus, they only need to put the LV image out there and have other women believe-for a short period of time, even-that they own the genuine purse or handbag. I think men tend toward pride-of-ownership in a much greater capacity than do women. I would say the Rolex argument is much closer to the knife argument as mostly men purchase Rolex watches.
 
I won't say as to whether or not I agree with the entire integrity argument, I will say that I agree with not asking women about their designer hand bags. Women are predatory shoppers. All they care about-truly-is showing off the name brand. There is no pride of ownership with women and designer clothes, to be honest. Most women purchase these items as a way of internal-gender competition. Thus, they only need to put the LV image out there and have other women believe-for a short period of time, even-that they own the genuine purse or handbag. I think men tend toward pride-of-ownership in a much greater capacity than do women. I would say the Rolex argument is much closer to the knife argument as mostly men purchase Rolex watches.

<<removed by marcinek....ahh forget it.>>
 
Intellectual Property is Real Property!
Larceny, theft, robbery, stealing is wrong ethically.

Trust me when I say I am probably the cheapest mofo on this forum, and that's not just because the currency exchange rate. I ended up paying $36 for my Kershaw Scamp and almost $45 for my Kershaw Crown because of international shipping and customs duties. Those were still the cheapest quality knives I could afford. I still went ahead choosing them over a large number of Chinese fakes I could procure at less than half that. I have seen a Sebenza clone in a flea market that looked good enough to fool most people who have never seen or held a Sebenza and cost all of $15. I did not buy it.

Why? Well firstly I don't steal or buy stolen property. And IT BLOODY WELL IS stolen property. Secondly, the options for beautiful and beautifully made blades at prices I can afford exist and in significant numbers. The CRK clone actually had the engraved CRK logo on it. I avoid Sanremnu or whatever that is called because I am yet to see evidence that Chris Reeves has allowed the use of his design.

No one needs Chris Reeve's permission. There are no design or utility patents on the Sebenza. SRM can produce all of the clones they want. As far as I could tell, CRK's trademarks are all expired too. Again, I didn't look too hard for trademark infringement as I think selling a fake Sebenza and marketing it as anything other than a "fake" or "Sebenza-style" knife is taking things too far since it results in people buying something that they never would have bought otherwise.
 
You can get a ZT 350 blem in the $80 ballpark (sorry if this has been mentioned already, read the first couple pages then skipped to the end)

You get an original, trademarked, legit knife from an extremely good company.

Oh yeah and the knife itself is absolutely bada$$

Spend your money on the real thing. I would take a $30 skyline over a $50 knock off any day, I'd actually take a $30 skyline over a lot of things for that matter.... in fact, just buy a skyline! :-P
 
No one needs Chris Reeve's permission. There are no design or utility patents on the Sebenza. SRM can produce all of the clones they want. As far as I could tell, CRK's trademarks are all expired too. Again, I didn't look too hard for trademark infringement as I think selling a fake Sebenza and marketing it as anything other than a "fake" or "Sebenza-style" knife is taking things too far since it results in people buying something that they never would have bought otherwise.

I did a little bit of research as well and it seems that design patents last 14 years and other patents 17 or 20 years. If a patent has run out, nobody can call it "thievery" or "stealing" etc., because it isn't. It's free for all to copy if there is no patent and you can even copy a name if there is no trademark etc. If someone thinks it's stealing for whatever sentimental reasons, then that is their prerogative, but it has nothing to do with what is legal or not.
 
Last edited:
It is not about the quality of the knives. I actually liked that someone tried to define "knock off" v/s "copy" v/s "clone".
Its about passing something off as what it isn't. If the damn strider clone is so good, why not make a few changes in the design that wont affect its effectiveness or cool factor negatively and re-brand it? The idea is to utilize the emotional equity (read- brand value) built up by Chris Reeves or Giorgio Armani to sell the fake product. I have a lot of Chinese knives. Un-branded stuff as well as known knife companies with products manufactured in China. They manufacture in China for purely economic reasons. I see nothing wrong with that either. The problem is when they steal the name and brand of someone who has been through the trouble of building it in the first place. That is what I and I believe everyone must take exception to. Sanrenmu might not claim to make a Sebenza but their product is clearly and obviously a copy of it. Again if you can be original enough to make a knife well and out of good material with good tolerances why cant you make the effort to promote it as what it is? To throw a little jargon around, its called diseconomy of time compression. It is impossible for them to achieve the emotional equity of a known brand in the time and money they have to make and sell these knives in any significant numbers to be profitable. They simply steal the equity of others and utilize the purchase drive of the less knowledgeable and yes, less ethically inclined.
By all means buy whatever you want. It definitely is your money and no one can tell you what to do with it. Bu there is so much out there that does NOT expressly steal someone's intellectual property. Take a look...............and glory be to the internet and Al Gore who invented it. ;)
 
No one needs Chris Reeve's permission. There are no design or utility patents on the Sebenza. SRM can produce all of the clones they want. As far as I could tell, CRK's trademarks are all expired too. Again, I didn't look too hard for trademark infringement as I think selling a fake Sebenza and marketing it as anything other than a "fake" or "Sebenza-style" knife is taking things too far since it results in people buying something that they never would have bought otherwise.
Well yes I guess if the patents have legally expired, he no longer needs to expressly permit anyone. Isn't it people who want a Sebenza and cant afford it who buy the Sanrenmu. If the Sanrenmu had an original design I doubt they would sell 20% of the knives they move today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top