RevDevil’s last comment brings up one issue I have with this thread.
There has been at times a lumping of all knives made in China with those specifically made by the firms mentioned in the title of this thread. I feel, instead, that they fall into two categories.
On the one hand, there are knives American companies have commissioned to be made in China. These knives are designed by those firms, and their specifications are set by them. There is no theft of ideas possible, and American companies are making a profit. I consider this to be part of the global economy.
As for quality, my impression is that the Chinese will produce whatever you want to pay for, and oversee. If you’re Frost and you want junk to sell at gas stations for a buck, that’s what you get. If you want Spyderco quality, you provide those specs, some of the materials, and hire lots of inspectors. America makes cars that vary enormously in price point, and the quality shifts accordingly, as it should. Similarly, all Chinese knives are not the same.
In one recent thread, there were even strong objections to A.G. Russell selling knives he designed, but that he chose to have made in China. There was no question of copying; the objection was to American traditional patterns being made in China. I consider this jingoism, and possibly worse; would they have objected to such knives being made in Belgium? What about the original versions, often from patterns in British knives?
But then there are the knives mentioned here, which I consider a different matter altogether. I can accept a manufacturer adapting another knife’s ideas, but this goes beyond that. In many of these knives there is a little button up front that looks a lot like the release button on an Axis lock. I just looked at the Exduct site, and SRM #6261, e.g., explicitely states, in the product description, “Axis lock type.” The matter of Spyder holes has already been raised. I just can’t do that.
I will buy legitimate products made in China. I can’t sanction this, however.