Quenching Oil Question

Maybe we can't say what's "best", but we can definitely determine some things that are not good, like perlite in your edge. Why would anyone avoid doing the absolute best they can in heat treatment? It's not like it's terribly complicated or expensive.
 
All that really matters is whether or not you can get the blade to do what you intended it to do, whether it be passing the ABS test, slicing cheese, chopping through metal bars, then tying it into a pretzel, tree top a standing hair or just sit in a display case looking good, etc… or any possible combination of the above, etc., etc., etc., whether or not it will do what it was intended to do and keep on doing it and doing it some more…

Outside of that, who gives a freak about the metallurgy, microstructures or quenching mediums?

If the metallurgy helps achieve whatever it is you want to achieve, then great!… as long as you don’t get lost in it and lose site of what it is you are really trying to do.

I really don't have any problem with diversity, or knives that are not even intended to cut anything,... ceremonial knives, art knives, display knives, wall hangers, conceptual knives, dance and performance knives or any type of non-functional knife, or any knife who's primary function is something other than pure cutting performance. Cutting performance can be either a primary concern, secondary,... or how ever you want to do it. No one will ever have a monopoly on it, or figure out which way is best for all.
 
Last edited:
The entire appeal of handcrafted "custom" knives is that there is a gestalt where design, craftmanship, and heat treatment are all hoped to be treated thoughtfully.
Talking about one aspect of that gestalt in technical terms does not preclude the importance of the others. Likewise, talking about heat treating as a standalone technical topic without including the other aspects doesn't marginalize it, either.

Tai, while I prefer the technical approach to heat treating, that doesn't preclude my joy in your designs and your methods. I'm sure many others besides me would enjoy a thread where you teach us something about how you approach design and what influences your creativity. I'm always eager for a knife-art lesson, and for improving my knifemaking gestalt.
 
I don't see anything wrong with the idea of making a knife that will never be used to cut anything, but could,.... or the idea of making knives that look good, feel good and cut good, or the idea of pure performance, but those are just individual concepts open to interpretation... they are also popular ideas. However, no one can proove or argue that they are the only correct ideas.

I don't see anything wrong with going green, going primitive, going voodoo, or going all scientific. How you want to make the knife and what you find interesting, and enjoyable are also very important.
 
Thanks Tai Goo for you're insight. At least now I can get on with making knives and stop stressing about the technicalities. I enjoy most making knives that are traditional and closer to what a frontier bladesmith would have made. They probably weren't all that scientific back then, but the knives they produced still worked and are well respected. However, before sending any of my knives out for sale I am going to put each one through rigorous testing for strength, cutting ability, and overall performance. So even if they are not scientifically "perfect", I know they'll still do the job and do it well. If I ever can find the stuff in my area though, I will definitely be picking up some of the recommended quenching oil. Anything to make a better quality knife.
 
Well that was a nice reversal he managed...

I'm going to make this suggestion yet again:

Use 1080 or 1084 instead of 1095 unless you have proper quenches or a specific reason to use 1095. That's the only switch you need to make if you want to worry less about the details. As Kevin already showed, you've reached the point of diminishing returns before .95% carbon. Why not go to a steel that will make a knife just as good (if not better) and costs less money? Unless you're trying to get decorative there's no reason to avoid it.

Maybe no one here will take that advice. Their loss I suppose.
 
I don't see anything wrong with the idea of making a knife that will never be used to cut anything, but could,.... or the idea of making knives that look good, feel good and cut good, or the idea of pure performance, but those are just individual concepts open to interpretation... they are also popular ideas. However, no one can proove or argue that they are the only correct ideas.

I don't see anything wrong with going green, going primitive, going voodoo, or going all scientific. How you want to make the knife and what you find interesting, and enjoyable are also very important.

I agree with you completely, Tai. There would be little sense in pursuing knifemaking if it wasn't done to be enjoyable and interesting. I watched your video again yesterday, and, as always, truly revel that there are many paths on this journey.

Earlier in this thread I used the phrase "informed decision making". Knowledge gives us the power to make our own choices, instead of having someone else make them for us. That way, we choose our own path, which is, of course, the most precious of all. Blindly following anyone usually benefits no one but the guru.

That doesn't preclude the fact I'd like to see you do some threads on what makes your creativity turn out artifacts from fetish knives to eneps. :) I always relish the opportunity to learn something new.
 
Well that was a nice reversal he managed...

I'm going to make this suggestion yet again:

Use 1080 or 1084 instead of 1095 unless you have proper quenches or a specific reason to use 1095. That's the only switch you need to make if you want to worry less about the details. As Kevin already showed, you've reached the point of diminishing returns before .95% carbon. Why not go to a steel that will make a knife just as good (if not better) and costs less money? Unless you're trying to get decorative there's no reason to avoid it.

Maybe no one here will take that advice. Their loss I suppose.

You're advice is well taken and I am not choosing any sides on the matter. I plan on contacting my steel supplier to see if they can get me some 1080 or 1084. So far all I've been able to get up here is 1095, so basically just trying to work with what I've got for now. I'll be a knifemaker today and a scientist tomorrow. You're input and criticism are well appreciated.
 
That doesn't preclude the fact I'd like to see you do some threads on what makes your creativity turn out artifacts from fetish knives to eneps. :) I always relish the opportunity to learn something new.

I wish it was that easy...

I'll say this right now though, every piece you create, says something about who you are,... and no two people are the same.

So, there really isn't any formula for good design... though there may be techniques that help. You just stay true to yourself and/or begin a journey to discover who you really are.

I use hypnagogic imagery and turn 3D objects in my minds eye, ... just let it ooze up from my subconscious... :D

Hypnagogia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnagogia


... Jist git 'er done! What ever it takes! :)
 
Thanks Tai Goo for you're insight. At least now I can get on with making knives and stop stressing about the technicalities. I enjoy most making knives that are traditional and closer to what a frontier bladesmith would have made. They probably weren't all that scientific back then, but the knives they produced still worked and are well respected. However, before sending any of my knives out for sale I am going to put each one through rigorous testing for strength, cutting ability, and overall performance. So even if they are not scientifically "perfect", I know they'll still do the job and do it well. If I ever can find the stuff in my area though, I will definitely be picking up some of the recommended quenching oil. Anything to make a better quality knife.

Heat treating is nothing but a big old can of worms! You won’t find two people who agree on every point.

Don’t stress over it!

Follow your own path and see where it leads…
 
I'm going to make this suggestion yet again:

Use 1080 or 1084 instead of 1095 unless you have proper quenches or a specific reason to use 1095. That's the only switch you need to make if you want to worry less about the details. As Kevin already showed, you've reached the point of diminishing returns before .95% carbon. Why not go to a steel that will make a knife just as good (if not better) and costs less money? Unless you're trying to get decorative there's no reason to avoid it.

Maybe no one here will take that advice. Their loss I suppose.

Its good advise as far as I can tell. The knife I am in the process of making (my first knife) is made of 1095 because the place I ordered the piece of steel had 1095 but neither of those others. Given that any more knives I make are going to be heat treated using basically primitive methods for a while at least, I think next time I will find some 1084.

Luckily the wood stove forge, magnet on a stick and automatic transmission fluid method seems to have worked fine. Albeit there are no micrographs taken and no Rockwell hardness tests performed on the knife, and there never will be. It could probably be done better though, and from everything I have since read, the same method would probably be more reliable and work better with 1080 or 1084.
 
I wish it was that easy...

I'll say this right now though, every piece you create, says something about who you are,... and no two people are the same.

So, there really isn't any formula for good design... though there may be techniques that help. You just stay true to yourself and/or begin a journey to discover who you really are.

I use hypnagogic imagery and turn 3D objects in my minds eye, ... just let it ooze up from my subconscious... :D

Hypnagogia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnagogia


... Jist git 'er done! What ever it takes! :)

Well, I was hoping for something a little more expansive, to be honest. I know that surely a 35-year knifemaker with an MFA and college-level teaching experience has stopped to think about how things like the Prinicples of Design and aesthetics apply to the artistic side of knifemaking. I think that you could have much to teach, were you willing. Topics like inclusion of elements of ethnographic designs into knives would be right up your alley.

That said, how much one elects to teach on forums is everyone's personal choice. It certainly frees one up to spend more time in rebuttal of others. :D
 
Mike,... it already sounds like you know more about it than I do. :D

Then you must have been hypnogogitating in class instead of taking notes.... ;)
Something tells me your just being demure and humble, though. :eek:
 
Well, there's an old saying and it goes something like this,... "You can lead a horse to transmission fluid,... but you can't make it drink."

LOL... just hypnogogitating! :)
 
“I am struggling with a proper heat treating method based on the tools that I have available and can afford. What I have available is a gas fired forge with no temperature controller.

I started out using only O1 since I thought is was a good steel for knives and was easy to heat treat. After making quite a few blades I became aware of the proper heat treating methods and decided that I could not get a proper heat treat without proper temperature control and a proper soak period. So... no more O1 for me until I get a heat treat oven.

I am now using 1095 and I have invested in a 5 gallon bucket of Parks #50. I want to get the best out of the steel I am using with the tools I have at hand. Can you please give me some direction on how to get the best heat treat on 1095 using a gas forge with no temperature control and Parks#50 as a quench?

I am working hard to learn as quickly as possible, but there is quite a bit of conflicting information on the net. All I want is to do is to produce the highest quality knife I can.

I would like to sell knives at some point, but not until I know that the product I am producing is worthy of being sold. Any help/advice you can give me is greatly appreciated!”


I recently received this inquiry and thought I would share it here to contribute in a very relevant way to this discussion. I also very much wanted to address this question because it would allow me to show that I am not down on or anti simple tools themselves, I am however against limiting ones knowledge and thus the possibilities for the future. This questioner is a fine example of a bladesmith who has the basic tools available to most serious smiths and still wants to maximize his results now and in the future. I will never refuse to help such an individual with any information that I can.

You have known steels, a forge, a bucket of excellent quench oil, and a desire to make the most of it, that is more than enough to become a really good bladesmith. The move from O1 is probably a wise one, O1 is too often recommended as a great beginners steel simply on the hardenability alone, however it is NOT a simple steel in comparison. I have worked with O1 a lot over the years and while indeed it will harden in almost any liquid, it has some particular heating requirements that cannot be totally met with just a simple forge. It will make a fantastic knife with the proper tools however it is as much as 3 times as expensive as 1095 or 1080, and with just a forge you may not be able to make a better knife from it, so why spend that extra money when you can get better results with 1080 or 1095?

There is indeed far too much conflicting information both on the net and in print. One needs to very carefully filter what they read. On the net there are legions of “experts” who just started this a few months earlier than yourself and they have spent a few more hours reading and misinterpreting as much as they can so they can paste it together and sound very knowledgeable in their posts. It gets a little more complicated in print when folks who have been doing it for many years but have really needed to learn little manage to use some impressive smoke an mirrors to make themselves appear to know what they are talking about. My advice is to VERIFY, everything including what I tell you, the charlatans will not do well against verification, I invite it with my information since sound industry practices and metallurgical facts are my friends and I have found the when you apply them correctly they really work.

Now for the 1095. 1095 tends to get a bad wrap for a couple of reasons, the first is that it is not 1084. 1084 has just the right carbon levels to make the most complete resulting phases and it also has the manganese levels to allow it to harden a bit easier. 1095 has lower manganese levels causing it to need a faster quench, but it also has an extra .10% carbon that needs to be dealt with in order to insure it is useful and not detrimental.

The ideal final condition for 1095 is a very fine martensite (the hard stuff) containing around .8% carbon in solution with the extra .15% in very fine carbides evenly dispersed throughout. It is possible to do this with tight heat controls, but in the forge we can come close by using prior heat treatments to set things up. The worst condition for 1095 would be low carbon coarse martensite with all the extra carbon separated out in the grain boundaries; a blade made of this would have lousy edge holding and still be rather brittle.

To get what we want we should start our heat treating in the forging, and watching our heats. Start hot and work cooler as you get closer to finishing. Normalizing will be important. Start hot in normalizing as well, 1700F is not too hot. Allow to air cool as quickly as you can, cooling quickly to Ar1 (where pearlite forms) will be important in not having extra carbon where you don’t want it. Since 1095 is so simple all you have to do is cool below 1000F for good results. Believe it or not I have a large container of all kinds of old used oils that I use in normalizing. If you quickly quench into a sludgy oil just enough to turn the steel black and then reheat, you can refine things quite well without any carbon forming in the grain boundaries and not shock the steel by quenching from such a high temperature. For me the normalizing would consist of several cycles with the heat getting cooler every time. The final heat would be to just nonmagnetic and the quench would be all the way to room temp in preparation for the anneal.

Next take the quenched and hardened blank to a dull red glow but never allow it to go nonmagnetic, do this several times but always staying magnetic, if you go over it kind of takes you back to square one. When done, cool in air. This should take all of the carbon and put it into very fine globs throughout that will allow machining and other operations.

When it is time to harden your 1095 blade, you should carefully heat it to nonmagnetic and hold it there for just a second (this isn’t really a soak but the attempt to hold will allow the temp to actually go slightly above nonmagnetic and achieve a good solution). Quench entirely under the surface of the #50 oil and keep the blade moving tip to tang as quickly as you can, do not just hold the blade still under the oil. If you wish to edge quench do NOT use the #50 as you will only ruin your investment in a good oil, get some cheap ATF (automatic transmission fluid) and ruin that with an edge quench technique. However I would also point out that there really is no strength benefits in an edge quench and the chances of fine pearlite at the edge are significantly increased.

As soon as the blade is down to the temperature of the oil, get it into a tempering oven preheated to at least 350F and heat it for around an hour. The actual tempering temperature will depend on your desired final hardness and how things worked out in the hardening heat. 400F normally makes a very good knife with 1095.

If you wanted to play with interrupted quenching and other techniques you should find plenty of information on that with a search of these forums. But this should give you a blade if fine gained 1095 that will only have pearlite at the very spine and a very nice carbide dispersion with good hardness. If properly done it should be able to slightly out cut a similar blade of 1080.
 
Little boxes, little boxes, little boxes made out of ticky tacky

Little boxes, little boxes, little boxes, all the same

There’s a green one, and a blue one, and a pink one, and yellow one

And they’re all made out of ticky tacky and they all look just the same.
 
Kevin, old buddy old pal,… what you are saying is no different than saying if a blade will bend 90 degrees in a vice, it would be even better if it bent back and forth 90 degrees several times, or if a Rockwell 60 is good a Rockwell 65 is even better, or if a 6 inch blade is good a 12 inch blade is even better, or if it will shave, it would be even better if it tree topped a standing hair.

I mean hey!
Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. It just depends what you are shooting for.
 
Back
Top