wolfmann601
Gone, but not forgotton. RIP Ira.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2001
- Messages
- 7,385
** SNIPPED The "Court of Public Opinion" is not a court of law. There is NO "burden of proof/standard of proof in the Court of Public Opinion." Each member of the public uses whatever standard he or she feels is fair -- if standards are thought about at all. So talk of "moral certainty" or "beyond a reasonable doubt" is as meaningless as a "preponderance of the evidence" -- when directed to others. It's only for each of us.
Tom, please re-read my post. I am not making reference to any "legal" standard in the "Court of public opinion".
It is my standard that I apply when one's reputation can be permanently damaged beyond repair. If the proof is uncontroverted that Dwyer/Poland are one in the same and Duane was never a Scout Sniper, the damage done is self-inflicted and he deserves to be publicly flogged, tarred and feathered.
My standard requires me to be absolutely certain and until I see some of the proof STR and others have seen but cannot talk about I will not be absolutely certain. For me, eventhough what I have seen is very strong proof, I need to be 100% certain. I am not a Strider team member, I have never even exchanged one E-mail ever with the guy, I just cannot yet take sides. I hope that does not make me a bleeding heart; for the record I have no heart!!!
Oh and Tom I read your legal writings on the other page and I do agree with you 110%. The truth of the matter as you stated is that when a Defendant does not testify the jury "infers" there is something to hide. All the instruction in the world will not change human nature, in lots of situations silence infers guilt. If I were a Juror and this was a Trial the silence here would be booming.
Back to my smoke popping.................