Bad Survive! Deserves A Permanent Post In The Hall Of Shame

As I said... recreational outrage.

Odd how some people are outraged by liars and thieves.
The social media age has taught us that forgiveness is rare. It’s not good enough to make amends. People wanna watch you burn.

At one time I really think a lot of people wanted to see Survive do the right thing. Had they done so this thread wouldn’t exist. If you want to support thieves that’s your business. I don’t and I won’t hesitate to tell a potential customer the truth about the thieving bastards.
 
Odd how some people are outraged by liars and thieves.


At one time I really think a lot of people wanted to see Survive do the right thing. Had they done so this thread wouldn’t exist. If you want to support thieves that’s your business. I don’t and I won’t hesitate to tell a potential customer the truth about the thieving bastards.

That's sweet.
 
I'm super curious about the end game myself.

I feel like at this point it's just back-at-ya... so it's getting boring. I'll probably drift off to something else that interests me. I certainly can't keep running on this hampster wheel for 4 years like some.

I know this is y'all's little private space for hating on SK! and agreeing with each other and patting yourselves on the back for it. So I do apologize for kicking your little hornet's nest.
 
Moral judgements are worth their weight in hot air. They don't get anything done, and they certainly don't keep the lights on. All that matters is what IS.
Lets all keep in mind who we're dealing with here.
I tell you what... it might be immoral to ban this jerk without cause, but I think if he doesn't care maybe we shouldn't either.

He's self-admittedly trolling these threads for his entertainment.
 
Might be nothing more than he enjoys arguing. Thieves and liars do sometimes change, but they gotta prove it. Talks cheap and all.
I just can’t understand the reasoning behind someone defending them.

How have I defended them? I've never once said that they're right. I've never once said it's ok to not deliver product that a customer has paid for in good faith. You'll not find a single comment from me saying that SK! is in the right. Not a single one.
 
How have I defended them? I've never once said that they're right. I've never once said it's ok to not deliver product that a customer has paid for in good faith. You'll not find a single comment from me saying that SK! is in the right. Not a single one.
So you're here with literally no purpose than to say you think a thread continuing to bash S!K is stupid?
Get the absolute hell outta here with that noise- at this point your posts are about the people here and not the topic.

I think you can find the door, but perhaps I assume too much.
 
Doesn’t seem to be stoping them from selling knives.
I think the problem is more that they aren't selling knives: they're selling hope of a knife.
I’m not defending them. I’m questioning the effectiveness of this absurd thread.
This thread is a warning and I am an example of one who didn't buy a S!K due to this exact thread. I love the style, materials, functionality, and promised warranty... I was ready to pull the trigger on one in the secondary market and then found this thread in my research. A company who can't keep their promise to produce a knife that's been paid for certainly won't warranty the knife if it fails. There are plenty of companies that DO everything that S!K claims they will do eventually, someday, maybe in a different steel... Anyway, I appreciated the warning.
 
How have I defended them? I've never once said that they're right. I've never once said it's ok to not deliver product that a customer has paid for in good faith. You'll not find a single comment from me saying that SK! is in the right. Not a single one.
You’ve suggested numerous times they should keep doing what they’re doing, for various reasons. It not only trivializes people who have been victimized by their questionable business practices, it also strongly suggests you’re ok with what they’re doing.

You’re here ridiculing people for publicizing this company’s and its owners’ bad behaviors and horrible track record for delivering on goods that have been paid for by their own accounting, for the purpose of preventing others from being victimized by that bad behavior. Again, strongly suggests you’re ok with what they’re doing and have been doing for at least the past 9 years.

So, if you’re not defending them, then you’re just here playing games trying to spin people up, and/or you’re totally full of crap.
 
How have I defended them? I've never once said that they're right. I've never once said it's ok to not deliver product that a customer has paid for in good faith. You'll not find a single comment from me saying that SK! is in the right. Not a single one.
No you’re just indifferent to how they have cheated others. You’re just willing to go along with shady business practices as if it doesn’t matter. And you’re trying to convince people who don’t want to encourage liars and thieves that they are somehow in the wrong.
Your entire argument is garbage.
 
Back
Top