Honestly, I would argue entirely the opposite. Every piece of available information points to Hoback lying about the origin of his knives. That's been the beginning and ending of the charges levied against him. No one is saying that he should be shot on sight. You, however, are insisting on stretching the bounds of credulity to give him every possible benefit of the doubt, including positing wildly unlikely hypothetical scenarios as explanations as to how he might not be lying. The simple, easy, logical conclusion that falls in line with Occam's Razor is that Jake Hoback lied. Then, when trying to defend himself about it, he lied again, because that's what liars do. You, however, have vociferously denied that possiblity at every turn, going to absurd lengths and torturing the extremes of logic in order to do so.