yep.Right, which he knew would benefit him monetarily.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
yep.Right, which he knew would benefit him monetarily.
And remember that the Chinese manufacturer just forgot to put the Made in China labels on every single shipment of every single model and then customs dropped the ball every single time and then Hoback was either so ignorant of the law that he didn't realize it was required or didn't notice the lack of Made in China labels every single time.No, no, it was all the mean ole dealers' fault for "misrepresenting" his knives, and sending him big checks from those sales. Definitely not any wrongdoing on his part.![]()
Thanks for not bringing up that devastating, partial conversation with someone who wasn't a knife dealer at a blade show where we can't really tell what they're talking about again.![]()
And remember that the Chinese manufacturer just forgot to put the Made in China labels on every single shipment of every single model and then customs dropped the ball every single time and then Hoback was either so ignorant of the law that he didn't realize it was required or didn't notice the lack of Made in China labels every single time.
yep.
You're assuming that he did deliberately misrepresent his knives, which is not the case.
The burden of proof is much lower in a civil case with plantiffs just needing a little bit more than 50% chance of probability that it’s true.
You still need to make the case that Hoback intentionally misled distributors. 50.1% doesn’t mean everyone walks in and flips a coin.The burden of proof is much lower in a civil case with plantiffs just needing a little bit more than 50% chance of probability that it’s true.
Inaction once he knew that his knives were being sold as made in America is an action. It does infact make him complicit. Whether he told dealers his knives were made in America is still unverified, what we do know is Jake hobacks character is questionable at best, due to his inaction of correcting the dealers who had his knives listed as USA made. So, it stands to reason, if we are to make an assumption of whether or not he told the dealers they were made in America, why would you give him the benefit of the doubt?
My opinion is there was deceit from the get go, judging off the willful inaction and subsequent response he has taken.
That's a point that has merit, are we to assume the customs missed every shipment from China being labeled? For years? Come on.Candidly speaking, I'm starting to wonder if we aren't speaking to Jake's legal advisor directly in this thread. All of the posts are starting to seem an awful lot like they're meant to be misdirection of attention away from Jake's obvious bad acting in this situation, foisting responsibility off on the dealers.
At the end of the day, one fact that looks pretty clear is: dealers weren't removing the legally required "Made in China" stickers from Jake's products made in China. That tells me that Jake was acting in his best interests when he or his employees were doing that before sending those products to his dealer network.
But it does matter for many different products.Not saying it's valid, but from his comments it sounds like he justifies it by saying that, if the knives are of equal quality, they should fetch an equal price. Aren't there car manufacturers that assemble the same models in different countries and charge the same price, regardless of COO?
It would be an interesting experiment, wouldn't it? Make the same knife, identical in all respects, except charge $400 for the Chinese-made knife and $600 for the US-made knife. I wonder which would sell better?
He absolutely did. You can't just ignore evidence because it doesn't fit your argument.You're assuming that he did deliberately misrepresent his knives, which is not the case.
Yep. How else am I supposed to interpret:He absolutely did. You can't just ignore evidence because it doesn't fit your argument.
Overruled, & watch yourself McCoy. Do not badger the witness.He absolutely did. You can't just ignore evidence because it doesn't fit your argument.
What he actually says is, "so all this is made here," indicating something ("this") that we can't see on camera.Oh, you mean that part where someone specifically asks if his knives are made in the US and he says "Yep, everything's made here" that your poor, poor ears just couldn't hear (yet all of us could hear it clearly)? Poor dear. <3
Honestly, I personally think that there's enough evidence, especially when you take all these items in aggregate, that it would be exceptionally difficult for China Jake to skate on this, if it were to ever come to that. And trust me, a Judge or abitrator would definitely look at all these things and start asking some really tough questions for which "B..bu..but, this is how I feed my family..." wouldn't be considered a valid answer.
You still need to make the case that Hoback intentionally misled distributors. 50.1% doesn’t mean everyone walks in and flips a coin.
Out of curiosity, what would it take for you to not give hoback the benefit of the doubt?What he actually says is, "so all this is made here," indicating something ("this") that we can't see on camera.