I agree with you that in general Reate offers better materials and costs less. But my point is that these are not significantly enough to swing many people. At this price point, people are not just looking at materials and built quality; the fame and history of the brand can be equally important if not more.
I had/have multiples of both CRK and Hinderer, and I still put them in the same category based on their quality, material, fit & finish, ergonomics, price, and pride of ownership. I understand it is a personal opinion (RHK and CRK being in the same category) that not everyone agrees to.
		
		
	 
I can't say this with absolute certainty, but given the frequency of Reate preorders and drops (their own stuff, plus SBD, Pena, Chaves, Liong Mah, Tashi, Begg, Varga, etc.) I think it's reasonable to infer that they move more knives than CRK does. The designers who they OEM for don't seem to have any problem selling out their runs, so I can't agree that their pricing costs them a meaningful number of sales.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			If you buy knives primarily on price point only, then I suppose this argument holds water.  Others however, start thinking pesky things like "Man, that $750 I just spent with CRK keeps some of my fellow Americans employed."  Don't see where Reate is keeping Americans employed.   
 
Also?  There's a reason why CRKs have much better resale value than Reates do.  I'm trying to put my finger on it, hold on, I'm sure it will come to me.  
 
		 
I'm likely a lot less price sensitive than most, so that's generally not a factor. The main factor for me is that I buy designs I like; if it interests me and I can afford it, I'll buy it. I prefer to buy new and I hate things like lotteries and nonsense like that. I'd much rather preorder and know I'll get a knife when it's done. I think I have at least one of every model Brian Nadeau has released with Reate because I like his designs. That may not support as many domestic jobs as buying a CRK, but it sure does keep Sharpbydesign in business.
As far as resale value, it depends a lot on good ol' supply and demand. I rarely sell knives, but Reate's OEM work is in relatively high demand and low supply, so the one I sold (because I had multiples of that model) went for a decent amount above what I paid for it. Another one was traded for a US-made knife plus $100 (worked out to break even at retail prices; given what the secondary prices were on the knife I got, I came out ahead). For CRK, it's the same issue (although the only CRKs that I've seen regularly sell for more than retail are the CGG variants), except the supply and demand for CRKs is much less cyclical. Either way, I got my Inkosi for 20% below retail, so 

  I've still got that one, but CRKs are much more utilitarian than any of my Reate knives, so I don't think they're actually competitors in the sense that people actually cross-shop them.
As to the question I had answered, "why would someone pay high prices for a Reate-made knife?", it personally boils down to the fact that Reate makes really, really nice knives in designs I like.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			For sure, 100% USA-made knives employ more Americans.  But like I said before, US knife makers also use Chinese OEMs and that effectively employs those designers.  For guys like Brian Nadeau, for example, it isn't a choice of manufacturing in the US or China.  The choice is between making *only* full custom knives or making customs *and* using Chinese OEMs for mid-tech knives.
		
		
	 
I think the lack of comparable OEMs in the US is something that is very much overlooked. Look at what happened with Millit... I don't know how much OEM work TRM/Halpern Titanium does these days, given that they can't even fill their own demand. ProTech does at least some OEM work, but I'm pretty sure it's always co-branded (e.g., Boker by ProTech) and only autos or button locks. Which basically leaves the choice you noted: make production knives using a foreign OEM or don't make them at all. At the moment, the highest quality OEM with sizable production capacity is Chinese.