- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1,785
Yet you were able to show up at their front door. Something that can't be done with QM.
You must work for them hence you're defensive attitude......What a loser.
Name calling? Nice....

The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Yet you were able to show up at their front door. Something that can't be done with QM.
You must work for them hence you're defensive attitude......What a loser.
I am in that thread where that "proof" was submitted....here we are two years later and it is still conjecture. My argument still holds water.....
You should go back and read what I said then......
Again, you need to check and see what conjecture actually means. Because it's become clear that you're just using it as a weak handwave to dismiss the available evidence without addressing any of it.
con·jec·ture
kənˈjekCHər/
noun
noun: conjecture; plural noun: conjectures
1.
an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information.
Name calling? Nice....![]()
It is what it is. No other reason you'd defend those scum.
Nah....I am using it correctly.
So how do any of the facts I pointed out fit that definition? You could argue that reaching a conclusion that they're made in China would fall under it, but any English teacher in America would fail you if you did.
So how do any of the facts I pointed out fit that definition? You could argue that reaching a conclusion that they're made in China would fall under it, but any English teacher in America would fail you if you did.
Further note: Most definitions of conjecture are worded slightly differently, they typically contain the phrase 'without sufficient information.
I fixed it for you.
Name calling? Nice....![]()
I am not defending them so much as calling out BS pretending to be facts.
But thanks for doubling down on the name calling.
OUTSTANDING !!! :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:i see our name mixed in these posts alot, however we stopped carrying the quartermaster line very early this year after some concerns about the origin of their products. The current listings on our website are priced pretty much at my cost to clear them out.
Like most of you, i've raised this question over and over with our distributor and have yet to see any real solid proof of where the knives are made.
I am not defending them so much as calling out BS pretending to be facts.
OUTSTANDING !!! :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
No pretending. Do some research. Like I said, I challenge you to prove their legitimacy.
So gpknives had concerns, not proof.....
K.
So gpknives had concerns, not proof.....
K.
But since I did not start this line of questioning about their legitimacy, it is not on me to prove that they are in fact a US manufacturer.
Valid concerns that were not met with sufficient response from the brand in question.
This thread is about concerns, not a complete conclusion.
Enthusiasts are concerned that that there is lacking legitimacy to the 100% USA-made claim that the company advertises. Some very questionable facts have surfaced, and there has been no response or effort to clarify from the brand in question. These questions have gone on long enough for some major distributors to no longer feel comfortable advertising the claim. This is a problem for consumers and Quartermaster. It needs to be addressed, or they will continue to suffer the consequences. Perhaps a formal investigation by FTC will eventually be conducted, and that would provide a final verdict, but until then, we will continue to ask questions and voice concerns, as it our right and duty.
I hope that you can respect the value of asking questions and perusing facts in a matter such as this.
So if you were accused of a crime you surely would not get a "defense" attorney given you have to be proved guilty right. Yeah, im sure thats NOT how it works.