The Delta protocol was not and has never been about improving corrosion resistance. That's a happy side effect.
If you're getting a higher hardness with a secondary hardening hump you might be doing something wrong.
If you're having to temper down at 350 to get the hardness you're looking for, you might be doing something wrong.
The intent of the low temperature tweaks is to avoid the softer weaker martensite and mixed microstructure of the secondary hardening hump but it comes at the risk of stabilized retained austinite. Material condition going into heat treat, quench rate, quench depth and timing of cryo steps is critical and some of it is counterintuitive.
None of this is secret and none of this is special news. But, for sure, a manufacturer that is quenching an unground blank might struggle to reach the quench rate they need at the edge, and someone who is grinding hard and sharpening dry could easily run into issues overheating the edge. But there is more to the Delta protocol than this. And I'm not going to explain it to you.
But if you were going to claim that "the Delta protocol is heat treat marketing spin on a pretty typical heat treat", I'm going to call you full of shit because you don't know what you're talking about. You have not honestly and objectively evaluated it. You might not even be able to. You're full of it.
We are the current national and world bladesport cutting champions, and we did it with our own production blades. You don't achieve that without really having your act together. We are the best in the world at what we do and that's no joke. And I don't appreciate you suggesting otherwise when I'm quite certain you don't know what you're talking about here.
The Man has spoken.
Gentleman who runs a reputable company that's well known and loved here, who has put virtually undefeatable fixed blades in the hands of many = 1,015,534 (approx.)
Dude with 183 posts whose username is a reference to a knife company no one has ever heard of = 0